Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;36(9):899-908.
doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00798-6. Epub 2021 Sep 26.

Strength in causality: discerning causal mechanisms in the sufficient cause model

Etsuji Suzuki  1 , Eiji Yamamoto  2
Affiliations
Free article

Strength in causality: discerning causal mechanisms in the sufficient cause model

Etsuji Suzuki et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

The assessment of causality is fundamental to epidemiology and biomedical sciences. One well-known approach to distinguishing causal from noncausal explanations is the nine Bradford Hill viewpoints. A recent article in this journal revisited the viewpoints to incorporate developments in causal thinking, suggesting that the sufficient cause model is useful in elucidating the theoretical underpinning of the first of the nine viewpoints-strength of association. In this article, we discuss how to discern the causal mechanisms of interest in the sufficient cause model, which pays closer attention to the relationship between the sufficient cause model and the Bradford Hill viewpoints. To this end, we explicate the link between the sufficient cause model and the potential-outcome model, both of which have become the cornerstone of causal thinking in epidemiology and biomedicine. A clearer understanding of the link between the two models provides significant implications for interpretation of the observed risks in the subpopulations defined by exposure and confounder. We also show that the concept of potential completion times of sufficient causes is useful to fully discerning completed sufficient causes, which leads us to pay closer attention to the fourth of the nine Bradford Hill viewpoints-temporality. Decades after its introduction, the sufficient cause model may be vaguely understood and thus implicitly used under unreasonably strict assumptions. To strengthen our assessment in the face of multifactorial causality, it is significant to carefully scrutinize the observed associations in a complementary manner, using the sufficient cause model as well as its relevant causal models.

Keywords: Bradford Hill; Causal inference; Causal mechanisms; Counterfactual; Potential-outcome model; Sufficient cause model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(Suppl 1):S144–50. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Lucas RM, McMichael AJ. Association or causation: evaluating links between “environment and disease.” Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:792–5. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Morabia A. Hume, Mill, Hill, and the sui generis epidemiologic approach to causal inference. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:1526–32. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Olsen J, Jensen UJ. Causal criteria: time has come for a revision. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34:537–41. - PubMed - DOI
    1. VanderWeele TJ, Lash TL, Rothman KJ, et al. Causal inference and scientific reasoning. In: Lash TL, VanderWeele TJ, Haneuse S, et al., editors. Modern epidemiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021. p. 17–31.