Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1;30(3):433-448.
doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-20-00126. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

The Area Deprivation Index Corresponds Effectively With Other Measures of Objective Socioeconomic Status in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

Affiliations

The Area Deprivation Index Corresponds Effectively With Other Measures of Objective Socioeconomic Status in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

Pamela Jackson et al. J Nurs Meas. .

Abstract

Background and Purpose: How the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) performs compared to other measures of socioeconomic status (SES) is unknown. The study purpose is to compare the ADI and other measures of SES in their ability to predict pain severity/interference. Methods: Four measures of SES were compared-ADI, income, education, and subjective social status (SSS). Results: Pain severity/interference correlated positively with ADI (r = .396/r = .33), and negatively with income (r = -.507/r = -.428) and education (r = -.271/r = -.102). Criterion scores of the pain severity model suggest income performs best (AIC = 428.29/BIC = 436.22), followed by ADI (AIC = 437.24/BIC = 445.17), with education performing least well (AIC = 446.35/BIC = 454.29). Similar results were seen for the pain interference model. Conclusions: Neighborhood-level factors warrant consideration along with individual-level factors when attempting to understand the impact of SES on chronic low back pain.

Keywords: chronic pain; residence characteristics; social class; social environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relationship of objective and subjective SES measures and chronic low back pain. Note. ADI = Area Deprivation Index; 1 = Individual-Level, Subjective; 2 = Individual-Level, Objective; 3 = Area-Level, Objective.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
AIC and BIC scores for SES pain severity and pain interference with SES measures.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Degree of agreement between ADI Deciles for 2013 and 2015.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler NE, & Stewart J. (2007). The MacArthur Scale of subjective social status. Retrieved August 8, 2019, from https://macses.ucsf.edu/research/psychosocial/subjective.php
    1. Amirdelfan K, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Morgan DM, Kapural L, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, Yearwood TL, Bundschu R, Yang T, Benyamin R, Burgher AH, Brooks ES, Powell AA, & Subbaroyan J. (2018). Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT. Quality of Life Research, 27(8), 2035–2044. 10.1007/s11136-018-1890-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aroke EN, Jackson P, Overstreet DS, Penn TM, Rumble DD, Kehrer CV, Michl AN, Hasan FN, Sims AM, Quinn T, Long DL, & Goodin BR. (2020). Race, social status, and depressive symptoms: A moderated mediation analysis of chronic low back pain interference and severity. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 36, 658–666. 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000849 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Artiga S, & Hinton E. (2018). Beyond health care: The role of social determinants in promoting health and health equity (Issue brief). Henry J: Kaiser Family Foundation. http://files.kff.org/attachment/issue-brief-beyond-health-care
    1. Barber S, Hickson DA, Wang X, Sims M, Nelson C, & Diez-Roux AV. (2016). Neighborhood disadvantage, poor social conditions, and cardiovascular disease incidence among African American adults in the Jackson Heart Study. American Journal of Public Health, 106(12), 2219–2226. 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303471 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types