Predictive value of sperm motility before and after preparation for the pregnancy outcomes of intrauterine insemination
- PMID: 34488289
- PMCID: PMC8421663
- DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2021.04469
Predictive value of sperm motility before and after preparation for the pregnancy outcomes of intrauterine insemination
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate sperm motility and its changes after preparation as predictors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles.
Methods: In total, 297 IUI cycles from January 2012 to December 2017 at a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patient and cycle characteristics, and sperm motility characteristics before and after processing were compared according to clinical pregnancy or live birth as outcomes.
Results: The overall clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 14.5% (43/297) and the live birth rate was 10.4% (30/289). Patient and cycle characteristics were similar between pregnant and non-pregnant groups. Sperm motility after preparation and the total motile sperm count before and after processing were comparable in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Pre-preparation sperm motility was significantly higher in groups with clinical pregnancy and live birth than in cycles not resulting in pregnancy (71.4%±10.9% vs. 67.2%±11.7%, p=0.020 and 71.6%±12.6% vs. 67.3%±11.7%, p=0.030, respectively). The change in sperm motility after processing was significantly fewer in the non-pregnant cycles, both when the comparison was conducted by subtraction (post-pre) and division (post/pre). These relationships remained significant after adjusting for the female partner's age, anti-Müllerian hormone level, and number of pre-ovulatory follicles. According to a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an initial sperm motility of ≥72.5% was the optimal threshold value for predicting live birth after IUI.
Conclusion: Initial sperm motility, rather than the motility of processed sperm or the degree of change after preparation, predicted live birth after IUI procedures.
Keywords: Intrauterine insemination; Pregnancy; Semen analysis; Sperm motility.
Conflict of interest statement
Byung Chul Jee is an Editor-in-Chief and Seul Ki Kim is an Associate Editor of the journal, but they were not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Similar articles
-
Predictive value of sperm motility characteristics assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis in intrauterine insemination with superovulation in couples with unexplained infertility.Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2011 Mar;38(1):47-52. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2011.38.1.47. Epub 2011 Mar 31. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2011. PMID: 22384418 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive value of CASA parameters in IUI with frozen donor sperm.Int J Androl. 2009 Oct;32(5):498-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00886.x. Epub 2008 Apr 9. Int J Androl. 2009. PMID: 18399982
-
The impact of different sperm preparation methods on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective single-center cohort study.Fertil Steril. 2023 Sep;120(3 Pt 2):617-625. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.153. Epub 2023 May 22. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 37225072
-
Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review.Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Nov 15. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014. PMID: 24456701 Review.
-
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub3 PMID: 15266448 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a biomolecular approach to identify sperm functions and fertility using sperm RNAs.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Dec 5;11:1308167. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1308167. eCollection 2023. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023. PMID: 38116206 Free PMC article.
-
The Effectiveness of Sperm Preparation Using Density Mini-Gradient and Single-Layer Centrifugation for Oligospermia Samples.Acta Inform Med. 2022 Jun;30(2):100-104. doi: 10.5455/aim.2022.30.100-104. Acta Inform Med. 2022. PMID: 35774841 Free PMC article.
-
Global trends in semen quality of young men: a systematic review and regression analysis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Aug;40(8):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02859-z. Epub 2023 Jun 19. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37335419 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of current and previous sperm findings on outcomes of intrauterine insemination.Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Apr 8;23(1):e12574. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12574. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38590943 Free PMC article.
-
Is There Any Effect of Change in Pre-Wash and Post-Wash Semen Parameters on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination?J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 28;14(1):43. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010043. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38248745 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ombelet W, Dhont N, Thijssen A, Bosmans E, Kruger T. Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:300–9. - PubMed
-
- ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:265–77. - PubMed
-
- Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N, Lourdel E, Sanguinet P, Copin H. Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:79–88. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources