Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 31;10(8):1784.
doi: 10.3390/foods10081784.

Comparison of Nutritional Compositions and Essential Oil Profiles of Different Parts of a Dill and Two Fennel Cultivars

Affiliations

Comparison of Nutritional Compositions and Essential Oil Profiles of Different Parts of a Dill and Two Fennel Cultivars

Yuanpeng Hao et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Fennel and dill are widely used as food additives owing to their various biological activities, such as antioxidants, antimicrobials, food-preservatives, and seasoning capacities. Herein, the nutritional composition and essential oil (EO) chemical profiles of fruits, umbels, stalks, and roots from one dill and two fennel cultivars were evaluated. The fruits had the highest content of crude protein (≥15%), crude fat (≥8%), and phosphorus (≥0.5%), and exhibited the highest total energy (≥20 MJ/kg) and EO yield (≥2%). Moreover, estragole (86.56% in Fdf), anethole (71.17% in Fhf), fenchone (16.74% in Fhf), limonene (50.19% in Agf), and carvone (42.41% in Agf) were the main components of the EOs generated from the fruits. The chemical profiles of EOs in the roots were significantly different from those of the aerial parts of the fennel and dill; thus, the roots and aerial parts could be distinguished based on myristicin (Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) = 1.90399) and apiol (VIP = 1.85922). The EO components of the aerial parts varied remarkably, and the chemical markers for differentiating these three cultivars were anethole (VIP = 1.36571), estragole (VIP = 1.30292), and carvone (VIP = 1.11947). Overall, our results provide a noteworthy chemical basis for further development of fennel and dill, especially as food additives.

Keywords: Apiaceae plants; efficient utilization; food additives; multivariate analysis; plant parts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative images of different parts of one dill and two fennel cultivars. (AC) Foeniculum vulgare “Dwarf” fruit (Fdf); (D) F. vulgare “Dwarf” umbel (Fdu); (E) F. vulgare “Dwarf” stalk (Fds); (F) F. vulgare “Dwarf” root (Fdr); (GI) F. vulgare “High” fruit (Fdf); (J) F. vulgare “High” umbel (Fhu); (K) F. vulgare “High” stalk (Fhs); (L) F. vulgare “High” root (Fhr); (MO) Anethum graveolens fruit (Agf); (P) A. graveolens umbel (Agu); (Q) A. graveolens stalk (Ags); (R) A. graveolens root (Agr).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nutritional composition (AG) and total energy (H) of fruits, umbels, stalks, and roots from three Apiaceae species. Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF); Foeniculum vulgare “Dwarf” (Fd), F. vulgare “High” (Fh), Anethum graveolens (Ag). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The evaluation of EO yields of all samples. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heatmap (A) and Spearman rank correlation plot (B) based on EO chemical profiling. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5
Figure 5
UpSet plot (A) and Venn diagram (B) based on the amounts of chemical components in EOs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
PCA map (A,B), dendrogram (C), score plots (D), and VIP values (E) from OPLS-DA analysis based on the chemical profiles of roots and aerial parts. Score plots (F) and VIP values (G) from OPLS-DA analysis based on the chemical profiles of three species (except for the roots).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sayed-Ahmad B., Talou T., Saad Z., Hijazi A., Merah O. The Apiaceae: Ethnomedicinal Family as Source for Industrial Uses. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017;109:661–671. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.027. - DOI
    1. Sousa R.M.O.F., Cunha A.C., Fernandes-Ferreira M. The Potential of Apiaceae species as Sources of Singular Phytochemicals and Plant-Based Pesticides. Phytochemistry. 2021;187:112714. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gautam P., Singh K., Kalra S., Khanna D., Paliwal Y.K., Mehan S. Dill Herb: Wall Against Dysfunctions: An Updated Profile. Int. J. Recent Adv. Pharm. Res. 2013;4:1–8.
    1. Rostaei M., Fallah S., Lorigooini Z., Abbasi Surki A. The Effect of Organic Manure and Chemical Fertilizer on Essential Oil, Chemical Compositions and Antioxidant Activity of Dill (Anethum graveolens) in Sole and Intercropped with Soybean (Glycine max) J. Clean. Prod. 2018;199:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.141. - DOI
    1. Ghanem M.T.M., Radwan H.M.A., Mahdy E.S.M., Elkholy Y.M., Hassanein H.D., Shahat A.A. Phenolic Compounds from Foeniculum vulgare (subsp. Piperitum) (Apiaceae) Herb and Evaluation of Hepatoprotective Antioxidant Activity. Pharmacogn. Res. 2012;4:104–108. doi: 10.4103/0974-8490.94735. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources