Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 4:11:683464.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.683464. eCollection 2021.

Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Production Capacity in Clostridioides difficile

Affiliations

Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Production Capacity in Clostridioides difficile

Layan Abu Rahmoun et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is one of the primary pathogens responsible for infectious diarrhea. Antibiotic treatment failure, occurring in about 30% of patients, and elevated rates of antibiotic resistance pose a major challenge for therapy. Reinfection often occurs by isolates that produce biofilm, a protective barrier impermeable to antibiotics. We explored the association between antibiotic resistance (in planktonic form) and biofilm-production in 123 C. difficile clinical isolates.

Results: Overall, 66 (53.6%) out of 123 isolates produced a biofilm, with most of them being either a strong (44%) or moderate (34.8%) biofilm producers. When compared to susceptible isolates, a statistically higher percentage of isolates with reduced susceptibility to metronidazole or vancomycin were biofilm producers (p < 0.0001, for both antibiotics). Biofilm production intensity was higher among tolerant isolates; 53.1% of the metronidazole-susceptible isolates were not able to produce biofilms, and only 12.5% were strong biofilm-producers. In contrast, 63% of the isolates with reduced susceptibility had a strong biofilm-production capability, while 22.2% were non-producers. Among the vancomycin-susceptible isolates, 51% were unable to produce biofilms, while all the isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility were biofilm-producers. Additionally, strong biofilm production capacity was more common among the isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility, compared to susceptible isolates (72.7% vs. 18.8%, respectively). The distribution of biofilm capacity groups was statistically different between different Sequence-types (ST) strains (p =0.001). For example, while most of ST2 (66.7%), ST13 (60%), ST42 (80%) isolates were non-producers, most (75%) ST6 isolates were moderate producers and most of ST104 (57.1%) were strong producers.

Conclusions: Our results suggest an association between reduced antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm production capacity. This finding reinforces the importance of antibiotic susceptibility testing, mainly in recurrence infections that may be induced by a strain that is both antibiotic tolerant and biofilm producer. Better adjustment of treatment in such cases may reduce recurrences rates and complications. The link of biofilm production and ST should be further validated; if ST can indicate on isolate virulence, then in the future, when strain typing methods will be more available to laboratories, ST determination may aid in indecision between supportive vs. aggressive treatment.

Keywords: C. difficile; biofilm production; metronidazole; recurrence; reduced antibiotic susceptibility; vancomycin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biofilm production capacity among metronidazole-susceptible isolates and isolates with reduced susceptibility. The biofilm production capacity of C. difficile isolates was compared between metronidazole-susceptible (n = 96) and reduced metronidazole susceptibility isolates (n = 27) (***p < 0.0001). The p value represents the comparison of the biofilm production capacity between susceptible isolates and isolates with reduced susceptibility (Chi square analysis).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of Metronidazole MIC values of non-biofilm producers, weak-, moderate- and strong biofilm-producing C. difficile isolates. The minimal, maximal and average MIC values are shown (the average is indicated by the line within the bar) for each group of isolates (non-producers, weak-, moderate- and strong producers’ groups). The mean metronidazole MIC of strong biofilm-producing isolates (n = 29) were significantly higher compared to MIC values of isolates that were non-producers (n = 57), weak producers (n = 14) and moderate producers (n = 23), ***p < 0.001. The p value represents the comparison of the mean MIC between the four categories of biofilm production capacity (ANOVA analysis).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biofilm production capacity among isolates that are vancomycin-susceptible and isolates with reduced vancomycin- susceptibility. The biofilm-production capacity of C. difficile isolates was compared between isolates that are vancomycin-susceptible (n = 112) and isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility (n = 11) isolates (***p < 0.0001). The p value represents the comparison of the biofilm production capacity between susceptible isolates and isolates with reduced susceptibility (Chi square analysis).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of vancomycin MIC values of non-biofilm producers, weak-, moderate- and strong biofilm producers. The minimal, maximal and average MIC values are shown (the average is indicated by the line within the bar) for each group of isolates (non-producers, weak-, moderate- and strong producers’ groups). The mean vancomycin MIC of strong biofilm producers (n = 29) were significantly higher as compared to MIC values of isolates that were non-producers (n = 57), weak producers (n = 14) and moderate producers (n = 23), ***p < 0.001. The p value represents the comparison of the mean MIC between the four categories of biofilm production capacity (ANOVA analysis).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agarwal A., Jain A. (2012). Association Between Drug Resistance & Production of Biofilm in Staphylococci. Indian J. Med. Res. 135, 562–564. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arciola C. R., Campoccia D., Gamberini S., Donati M. E., Pirini V., Visai L., et al. . (2005). Antibiotic Resistance in Exopolysaccharide-Forming Staphylococcus Epidermidis Clinical Isolates From Orthopaedic Implant Infections. Biomaterials 26, 6530–6535. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baugh S., Ekanayaka A. S., Piddock L. J., Webber M. A. (2012). Loss of or Inhibition of All Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium Results in Impaired Ability to Form a Biofilm. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2409–2417. 10.1093/jac/dks228 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baugh S., Phillips C. R., Ekanayaka A. S., Piddock L. J., Webber M. A. (2014). Inhibition of Multidrug Efflux as a Strategy to Prevent Biofilm Formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69, 673–681. 10.1093/jac/dkt420 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boekhoud I. M., Sidorov I., Nooij S., Harmanus C., Bos-Sanders I. M. J. G., Viprey V., et al. . (2020). Heme Is Crucial for Medium-Dependent Metronidazole Resistance in Clinical Isolates of C. Difficile. bioRxiv. 2020.2011.2018.388959. 10.1101/2020.11.18.388959 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources