Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 4:2021:1058671.
doi: 10.1155/2021/1058671. eCollection 2021.

Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose/Collagen Dressing for Management of Skin Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose/Collagen Dressing for Management of Skin Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Li Zhang et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. .

Retraction in

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wound healing efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen dressing and ORC/collagen/silver-ORC dressings compared to standard of care or control in treatment of chronic skin wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and pressure injuries sore ulcers (PISUs).

Methods: An electronic search was carried out in four popular databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify thirteen included studies, comparing the clinical efficacy of ORC/collagen dressings when compared to control in management of chronic skin wounds, especially DFUs, VLUs, and PISUs, and skin graft donor site wounds.

Results: Consolidated data from thirteen comparative clinical studies undertaken for management of DFUs, VLUs, and PISUs showed favorable outcomes towards use of ORC/collagen compared to other traditional and hydrocolloid foam dressings in terms of wound healing rate (P=0.02) and percentage wound relative reduction (P=0.003). The time taken to achieve complete wound healing in the included studies did not show any statistical significant difference (P=0.24). There was no significant difference in adverse events between ORC/collagen-treated group and comparative group (P=0.19).

Conclusion: ORC/collagen wound dressings are beneficial in terms of improved wound healing rate and percentage wound relative reduction compared to already existing traditional standard of care with non-MMP, inhibiting biomaterials such as moistened gauze, autologous growth factors, hydrocolloid foam dressings, or ovine extracellular matrix.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart showing study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot showing comparison of complete wound healing rate between ORC/collagen and control groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot showing comparison of time taken to achieve complete wound healing between ORC/collagen and control groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot showing comparison of percentage wound relative reduction between ORC/collagen and control groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot showing comparison of adverse events in wound healing between ORC/collagen and control groups.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Risk of (a) bias summary and (b) bias graph of all included studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Larouche J., Sheoran S., Maruyama K., Martino M. M. Immune regulation of skin wound healing: mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. Advances in Wound Care. 2018;7(7):209–231. doi: 10.1089/wound.2017.0761. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson K., Hamm R. L. Factors that impair wound healing. Journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists. 2014;4(4):84–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eming S. A., Krieg T., Davidson J. M. Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2007;127(3):514–525. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700701. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Theoret C. Physiology of wound healing. Equine Wound Management. 2016;2016:1–13.
    1. Dabiri G., Damstetter E., Phillips T. Choosing a wound dressing based on common wound characteristics. Advances in Wound Care. 2016;5(1):32–41. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0586. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources