Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;24(8):1213-1222.
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 May 18.

Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review

Lesong Conteh  1 , Kathryn Shuford  2 , Efundem Agboraw  3 , Mara Kont  4 , Jan Kolaczinski  5 , Edith Patouillard  6
Affiliations

Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review

Lesong Conteh et al. Value Health. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review the literature on the unit cost and cost-effectiveness of malaria control.

Methods: Ten databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify evidence relevant to the period 2005 to 2018. Studies with primary financial or economic cost data from malaria endemic countries that took a provider, provider and household, or societal perspective were included.

Results: We identified 103 costing studies. The majority of studies focused on individual rather than combined interventions, notably insecticide-treated bed nets and treatment, and commonly took a provider perspective. A third of all studies took place in 3 countries. The median provider economic cost of protecting 1 person per year ranged from $1.18 to $5.70 with vector control and from $0.53 to $5.97 with chemoprevention. The median provider economic cost per case diagnosed with rapid diagnostic tests was $6.06 and per case treated $9.31 or $89.93 depending on clinical severity. Other interventions did not share enough similarities to be summarized. Cost drivers were rarely reported. Cost-effectiveness of malaria control was reiterated, but care in methodological and reporting standards is required to enhance data transferability.

Conclusions: Important information that can support resource allocation was reviewed. Given the variability in methods and reporting, global efforts to follow existing standards are required for the evidence to be most useful outside their study context, supplemented by guidance on options for transferring existing data across settings.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; disease control interventions; malaria; unit cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographical distribution of eligible studies by intervention and study type.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2019. World Malaria Report 2019.
    1. Feachem R.G.A., Chen I., Akbari O. Malaria eradication within a generation: ambitious, achievable, and necessary. Lancet. 2019;394(10203):1056–1112. - PubMed
    1. RBM Partnership . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2015. Action and Investment to Defeat Malaria 2016-2030.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2015. Global Technical Strategy for malaria 2016-2030.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2019. Malaria Eradication: Benefits, Future Scenarios and Feasibility: Executive Summary.

Publication types