Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Nov 3;103(21):1963-1969.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01344.

Volar Plate Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization in Acceptably Reduced Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

C A Selles  1   2 , M A M Mulders  1 , J Winkelhagen  3 , P V van Eerten  4 , J C Goslings  5 , N W L Schep  2 ; VIPAR Collaborators
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Volar Plate Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization in Acceptably Reduced Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

C A Selles et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. .

Abstract

Background: The evidence for the treatment of acceptably reduced intra-articular distal radial fractures remains inconclusive. We therefore compared the functional outcomes of cast immobilization (nonoperative) and volar plate fixation (operative) for patients with these fractures.

Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled trial enrolled patients between 18 and 75 years old with an acceptably reduced intra-articular distal radial fracture. Patients were randomized to nonoperative treatment or to operative treatment. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score after 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire; a visual analog scale for pain; range of motion; grip strength; radiographic parameters; and complications. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: A total of 96 patients were randomized, and 90 (46 in the nonoperative group and 44 in the operative group) were included in the analysis. Patients treated in the operative group had significantly better functional outcomes measured with the PRWE at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Additionally, a 28% rate of subsequent surgery was identified in the nonoperative group.

Conclusions: Adult patients with an acceptably reduced intra-articular distal radial fracture have better functional outcomes for 12 months when treated operatively instead of nonoperatively. We therefore recommend surgical treatment for patients with these fractures.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G645).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bentohami A, Bosma J, Akkersdijk GJ, van Dijkman B, Goslings JC, Schep NW. Incidence and characteristics of distal radial fractures in an urban population in The Netherlands. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Jun;40(3):357-61. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
    1. Dutch Society for Surgery. Guideline Distal Radius Fractures, diagnosis and treatment. 2010. Accessed 2018 Nov 1. http://www.heelkunde.nl/uploads/h8/VM/h8VMOlRX83oW2NSR_5rTWw/Richtlijn_D...
    1. Danish Health Authority. National clinical guideline on the treatment of distal radial fractures. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Health Authority; 2016.
    1. Dresing K. Distale Radiusfraktur. In: Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V. (DGU). Berlin; 2014.
    1. Schneppendahl J, Windolf J, Kaufmann RA. Distal radius fractures: current concepts. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Aug;37(8):1718-25. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

Publication types

MeSH terms