Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 21:13:421-435.
doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S302289. eCollection 2021.

Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among US Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Compared with Controls

Affiliations

Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among US Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Compared with Controls

Angela V Bedenbaugh et al. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence, healthcare resource utilization and costs (HCRU&C) of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients versus controls.

Patients and methods: Retrospective, matched-cohort administrative claims analysis using IBM MarketScan databases (2011-2017). Newly diagnosed, adult (18+ yrs) knee OA patients identified by ICD9/10 code were matched 1:1 to controls by age, sex, payer, and geography; alpha level set to 0.05. Prevalence was estimated for 2017. All-cause and knee OA-related HCRU&C reported per-patient-per-year (PPPY) over follow-up period up to 4 years.

Results: Overall 2017 knee OA prevalence was 4% (615,514 knee OA/15.4M adults). A total of 510,605 patients meeting inclusion criteria were matched 1:1 with controls. The knee OA cohort had mean age 60 years and was 58% female. Versus controls, knee OA patients had significantly more PPPY outpatient (84.5 versus 45.0) and pharmacy (29.8 versus 19.8) claims, and significantly higher PPPY outpatient costs ($12,571 versus $6,465), and pharmacy costs ($3,655 versus $2,038). Knee OA patients incurred $7,707 more PPPY total healthcare costs than controls, of which $4,674 (60.6%) were knee OA-related medical claims and $1,926 (25%) were knee OA-related medications of interest. PPPY costs for nonselective NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, intraarticular hyaluronic acid, non-acute opioids, and knee replacement were higher for knee OA patients than controls. Using median and mean all-cause total cost ($9,330 and $24,550, respectively), the estimated sum cost of knee OA patients in MarketScan ranged from $5.7B to $15B annually.

Conclusion: This retrospective analysis demonstrated an annual 2017 prevalence of 4.0% (≥18 years) and 13.2% (≥65 years) for newly diagnosed knee OA patients. Compared with controls, all-cause costs were significantly higher for knee OA patients, nearly double that of matched controls, attributable to increased medical and treatment costs and comorbidity treatment burden. Additionally, the estimated annual cost of knee OA treatment was substantial, ranging between $5.7 billion and $15 billion.

Keywords: administrative claims; arthritis; economic burden; pharmacy costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AVB and JT are employees of Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc., and VL is an employee of The Kinetix Group. At the time of the study, MB and EHM were employees of IBM Watson Health. VL, MB, and EHM were contracted by Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc. to support the study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient selection paradigm. Knee osteoarthritis patients were directly matched to controls (1:1) on age category, sex, payer, and geographic region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Treatment utilization among knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients and controls. *P<0.001 versus control cohort. n/a, limitations inherent to select billing codes resulted in an operational study definition of intra-articular corticosteroid injections of the knee that prevented this treatment modality from being observed within control patients; a diagnosis of knee OA was used to define the injection location, which was a requirement for inclusion in the knee OA cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to treatment (in days) and PPPY treatment costs among knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients and controls. *P<0.001 versus control cohort. n/a, limitations inherent to select billing codes resulted in an operational study definition of intra-articular corticosteroid injections of the knee that prevented this treatment modality from being observed within control patients; a diagnosis of knee OA was used to define the injection location, which was a requirement for inclusion in the knee OA cohort.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hochberg MC, Cisternas MG. Osteoarthritis. In: The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States (BMUS). 4th ed. Rosemont, IL: United States Bone and Joint Initiative; 2019.
    1. Sinusas K. Osteoarthritis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85(1):49–56. - PubMed
    1. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323–1330. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cushnaghan J, Dieppe PA. Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. I. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:8–13. doi:10.1136/ard.50.1.8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Losina E, Weinstein AM, Reichmann WM, et al. Lifetime risk and age at diagnosis of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the US. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(5):703–711. doi:10.1002/acr.21898 - DOI - PMC - PubMed