Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 16;12(1):2308.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22589-z.

Classical MHC expression by DP thymocytes impairs the selection of non-classical MHC restricted innate-like T cells

Hristo Georgiev  1   2 , Changwei Peng  1 , Matthew A Huggins  1 , Stephen C Jameson  1 , Kristin A Hogquist  3
Affiliations

Classical MHC expression by DP thymocytes impairs the selection of non-classical MHC restricted innate-like T cells

Hristo Georgiev et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Conventional T cells are selected by peptide-MHC expressed by cortical epithelial cells in the thymus, and not by cortical thymocytes themselves that do not express MHC I or MHC II. Instead, cortical thymocytes express non-peptide presenting MHC molecules like CD1d and MR1, and promote the selection of PLZF+ iNKT and MAIT cells, respectively. Here, we report an inducible class-I transactivator mouse that enables the expression of peptide presenting MHC I molecules in different cell types. We show that MHC I expression in DP thymocytes leads to expansion of peptide specific PLZF+ innate-like (PIL) T cells. Akin to iNKT cells, PIL T cells differentiate into three functional effector subsets in the thymus, and are dependent on SAP signaling. We demonstrate that PIL and NKT cells compete for a narrow niche, suggesting that the absence of peptide-MHC on DP thymocytes facilitates selection of non-peptide specific lymphocytes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. An inducible Nlrc5 (CITA) approach to force DP thymocytes to express MHC Class I molecules.
a Schematic representation of positive selection of innate-like T cells on DP thymocytes. b mRNA expression level of murine Nlrc5 in different T-cell subsets from B6 WT mice. Data were obtained from ImmGen. c Flow cytometry analysis of HEK 293 cells transduced with lentivirus expression vector encoding the murine Nlrc5 coding sequence (CDS) or with empty virus as a control. As additional controls, non-transduced cells and isotype control staining are shown. Cells are analyzed 48 h post transduction. d Structure of the wild-type (WT) Rosa26 and the targeted allele of the transgenic mouse (Nlrc5-stopflox). e Flow cytometry evaluation of MHC I and MHC II expression on T cells from WT, CD4-Cre × Nlrc5-stopflox (T-MHC I), and Plck-CIITA (T-MHC II) transgenic mice. Data are representative of five independent experiments, n ≥ 5 mice per experimental group. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Expression of MHC I on DP thymocytes increased PLZF+ innate-like T cells (PILs) and decreased NKT cell numbers.
a Representative flow cytometry plots of total thymocytes from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice. b Data quantification according to the gating strategy displayed in a. Cell frequencies are plotted on the left axis and numbers on the right axis. c Total cell counts of MAIT cells and γδNKT cells in the thymus of WT and T-MHC I mice. d Representative plots of flow cytometry strategy for the identification of PIL cells in WT thymus. e Representative flow cytometry plots of staining for PIL cells comparing WT with T-MHC I and T-MHC II mice from the thymus and spleen. f Frequency (plotted on the left axis) and number (plotted on the right axis) of PIL cells from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice defined by the flow cytometry strategy depicted in d. b, c, f Each point represents one animal: n = 10 animals per group (WT and T-MHC I groups) and n = 8 animals (T-MHC II group) in b, n = 4 animals per group in c and n = 9 animals per group in f. Data are representative of five in a, b and eight in d–f independent experiments. One experiment was performed in c. Unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was performed in b, c, f); p ≥ 0.01 are not depicted, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. PIL T cells are SAP dependent and require MHC I in a cell-extrinsic manner.
a Representative flow cytometry plots of total thymocytes from Cd1d−/− and Cd1d−/− T-MHC I mice. b Thymic iNKT and PIL cell frequency and number comparison between WT and Cd1d−/−, and T-MHC I and Cd1d−/− T-MHC I mice. c Representative flow cytometry plots from a set of unequal bone marrow (BM) chimeric mice 8 weeks post transplantation. WT CD45.1+ mice were lethally irradiated and transplanted with a mix of WT CD45.1/2+ and T-MHC I CD45.2+ bone marrow at a ratio of 1 : 10. This experimental group is depicted as WT + T-MHC I group. In the control group, mice were transplanted with a mix of WT CD45.1/2+ and WT CD45.2+ bone marrow at a ratio of 1 : 10. This experimental group is depicted as WT + WT group. Shown are representative flow cytometry plots displaying the gating strategy from WT + WT group (in the left two panels). In the right four panels (in green) are shown representative plots displaying PIL cell frequencies (gated on WT CD45.1/2+) from the WT + WT group (on the left) and WT + T-MHC I group (on the right). PIL cell frequency evaluation is shown in d. e Representative flow cytometry plots of total thymocytes from Sh2d1a−/− (SAP deficient) and Sh2d1a−/− T-MHC I mice. iNKT, PIL, and Treg cell frequency are shown in f. b, d, f Each point represents one animal: n = 10 animals per group (WT and T-MHC I groups), n = 7 animals (CD1d−/− group), n = 3 animals (CD1d−/− T-MHC I group), n = 8 animals (WT + WT group), n = 9 animals (WT + T-MHC I group), n = 5 animals (Sh2d1a−/− group), and n = 6 animals (Sh2d1a−/− T-MHC I group). Data are representative of four in a, b, e, f and two in c, d independent experiments. Unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was performed in b, d and an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was performed in f; ns, not significant (p ≥ 0.05), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Both MHC I and MHC II induced PIL T cells exist in three major subsets, similar to NKT cells.
a Akin to iNKT cells, PIL T cells segregate into three subsets defined by expression pattern of transcription factors PLZF and RORγt. Shown are representative flow cytometry plots comparing PIL T-cell subsets from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice. b Comparisons of PIL T-cell subset frequencies (upper row) and numbers (lower row). c Representative flow cytometry plots of staining for CD4 and CD8α on PIL cells from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice. d Flow cytometry assessment of the TCR Vβ chain repertoire of thymic PIL T cells from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice in comparison to conventional T cells. e Exemplary plots showing staining for TCRβ on iNKT cell subsets compared to PIL T-cell subsets from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice. All analyzed animals are F1 generation with BALB/c mice (further characterized in Fig. 6). f CD44 and NK1.1 expression pattern on (from left to right) iNKT, WT PIL, T-MHC I PIL, and T-MHC II PIL T cells. b Each point represents one animal: n = 8 animals per group (WT and T-MHC II groups) and n = 9 animals (T-MHC I group). Data are representative of seven in a–c and three in d–f independent experiments. Unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was performed in b; ns, not significant (p ≥ 0.05), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. MHC II, but not MHC I, drives type 2 cytokine production in PIL T cells and induces memory phenotype CD8 T (TMP)-cell development.
a Representative flow cytometry plots of intracellular staining for Eomes on CD8 SP thymocytes from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice. b Number (plotted on the right axis) and frequency (plotted on the left axis) of CD8 TMP cells among CD8 SP cells in the thymus from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice, defined by the gating strategy shown in a. c Representative flow cytometry plots of thymocytes comparing PIL T-cell frequency from T-MHC I mice with CD8.4Tg/+ T-MHC I mice. Shown are summary evaluations for PIL T-cell number and frequency (right two panels). d Representative flow cytometry plots and summary evaluation for frequency of PIL2 T-cell subset among thymocytes from T-MHC I and CD8.4Tg/+ T-MHC I mice. Both groups are compared to WT mice. e Exemplarity flow cytometry plots of CD8 TMP cell frequency among CD8 SP cells in the thymus from T-MHC I mice with CD8.4Tg/+ T-MHC I mice (left two panels) and summary evaluation of CD8 TMP cell number (right panel). Each point represents one animal: n = 9 animals per group (WT and T-MHC II groups) in a, b, n = 9 animals (T-MHC I group) in c, d, n = 7 animals (T-MHC I group) in b, e, and n = 4 animals (CD8.4Tg/+ T-MHC I group) in c–e. Data are representative of 7 in a, b and 2 in c–e independent experiments. Unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was performed in b–e; ns, not significant (p ≥ 0.05), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. PIL T cells compete with iNKT cells.
a B6 WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice were crossed to BALB/c mice and F1 generation littermates (labeled as F1, F1 T-MHC I, and F1 T-MHC II) were analyzed by flow cytometry for frequency of iNKT and PIL T cells in the thymus. b Summary evaluation of iNKT and PIL T-cell frequency (left panel) and number (right panel) from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice on B6 and F1 background. c Inverse correlation between number of iNKT cells and the number of PIL T cells in the thymus from WT (black dots), T-MHC I (red triangles), and T-MHC II mice (blue inverse triangles) on B6 (left panel) and F1 (right panel) background. d Shown are representative flow cytometry plots comparing iNKT and PIL T-cell subsets from WT, T-MHC I, and T-MHC II mice on B6 (upper row) and F1 (lower row) background. Each point represents one animal: n = 10 animals per group (WT and T-MHC I groups), n = 8 animals (T-MHC II group), n = 9 animals (F1 WT group), n = 6 animals (F1 T-MHC I group), and n = 7 animals (F1 T-MHC II group) in a–d. Data are representative of seven independent experiments. Unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was performed in b; ns, not significant (p ≥ 0.05), ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. R2-values and p-values in c were calculated by fitting nonlinear regression and performing a Goodness-of-Fit test and extra-sum-of-squares F test. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Edholm ES, Banach M, Robert J. Evolution of innate-like T cells and their selection by MHC class I-like molecules. Immunogenetics. 2016;68:525–536. doi: 10.1007/s00251-016-0929-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vermijlen D, Prinz I. Ontogeny of innate T lymphocytes - some innate lymphocytes are more innate than others. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00486. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendelac A, Savage PB, Teyton L. The biology of NKT cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2007;25:297–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stetson DB, et al. Constitutive cytokine mRNAs mark natural killer (NK) and NK T cells poised for rapid effector function. J. Exp. Med. 2003;198:1069–1076. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crowe NY, et al. Glycolipid antigen drives rapid expansion and sustained cytokine production by NK T cells. J. Immunol. 2003;171:4020–4027. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.8.4020. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances