Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;24(1):E95-E100.

Prescription Opioid Use and Laboratory Value Derangements: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of NHANES Data

Affiliations

Prescription Opioid Use and Laboratory Value Derangements: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of NHANES Data

Micah Hartwell et al. Pain Physician. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The use of opioids for the treatment of pain is a risk versus benefit analysis and metabolic disease is an often overlooked variable in the equation and may lead to increased risk of comorbidities of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease and diabetes.

Objectives: Our objective was to identify and describe abnormalities among the comprehensive metabolic and lipid panels of individuals taking prescription opioids.

Study design: We performed a cross-sectional study of the laboratory values with 3 cycles (2011-2016) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in March 2020.

Setting: NHANES sampling is conducted using a multistaged, stratified, cluster sampling technique to create a representative sample of the United States.

Methods: We excluded patients with histories of cancer and under the age of 25 years. Our final sample size was 11,061 (n = 162,547,635), with 797 reportedly using a prescription opioid in the past 30 days-a weighted percent representing 22.95% of the US population. Our analyses identified mean differences in biomarkers between individuals taking prescription opioids and the US population.

Results: Laboratory values from the comprehensive metabolic panel were all within reference ranges for both groups, with only bilirubin levels being statistically lower in the group currently taking prescription opioids. Values from the lipid panel of both the opioid using and comparison groups were above reference range for total cholesterol and fasting glucose. The opioid using group was also higher than the reference range for triglycerides (mean [M] = 165.4, standard deviation [SD] = 14.2) and insulin (M = 15.5, SD = 2.2), whereas the comparison group was not. The oral glucose measure was within normal ranges for both groups; however, the opioid using group was 13.7 points higher than the comparison group (M = 122.3, SD = 1.8; M = 108.6, SD = 4.0; P < 0.01).

Limitations: While our study uses a large sample for a robust generalizable analysis it is a correlation study and a longitudinal cohort would provide better evidence linking potential disease states to prescription opioid use.

Conclusions: Although all Americans should be alarmed at the lipid levels reported in this study, specific combinations of heightened lipid laboratory values among prescription opioid users accelerate the trajectories toward comorbidities-heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes-leading to diminished quality of life. Therefore pain management and comprehensive drug recovery programs should include nutritional counseling and physical activity as part of their overall treatment plan.

Keywords: NHANES; analgesics; lab values; pain management; Opioid use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: AEE is an employee of Grünenthal Pharma, Spain.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Adjusted means of comprehensive metabolic panel values between individuals currently taking opioid prescriptions and those without in the US over 24 years of age, excluding those with a cancer diagnosis (NHANES 2011–2016). a Marginal means from regression models adjusted for age, race, gender, and BMI with statistical significance noted as (*) represents P < 0.05 and (**) as P < 0.01 compared NHANES participants over 25 years of age with no cancer diagnosis using mobile examination center (MEC) subsample and weighting modified for 3 cycles.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Adjusted means of lipid panel values between individuals currently taking opioid prescriptions and those without in the US over 24 years of age, excluding those with a cancer diagnosis (NHANES 2011–2016). aMarginal means from regression models adjusted for age, race, gender, and DMI with statistical significance noted as (*) represents P < 0.05 and (**) as P < 0.01 compared NHANES participants over 25 years of age with no cancer diagnosis. bUsing mobile examination center (MEC) subsample and weighting modified for 3 cycles. cUsed Fasting subsample and weighting modified for 3 cycles. dUsed Oral Glucose subsample and weighting modified for 3 cycles. Comparison group also higher than reference range.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nahin RL. Estimates of pain prevalence and severity in adults: United States, 2012. J Pain 2015; 16:769–780. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gregorian RS Jr, Gasik A, Kwong WJ, Voeller S, Kavanagh S. Importance of side effects in opioid treatment: A trade-off analysis with patients and physicians. J Pain 2010; 11:1095–1108. - PubMed
    1. Atici S, Cinel I, Cinel L, Doruk N, Eskandari G, Oral U. Liver and kidney toxicity in chronic use of opioids: An experimental long term treatment model. J Biosci 2005; 30:245–252. - PubMed
    1. Elmanama AA, Abu NE, Essawaf HN. Tramadol-induced liver and kidney toxicity among abusers in Gaza Strip, Palestine. Jordan J Biol Sci 2015; 8:133–137.
    1. Solis E Jr, Cameron-Burr KT, Shaham Y, Kiyatkin EA. Intravenous heroin induces rapid brain hypoxia and hyperglycemia that precede brain metabolic response. eNeuro 2017; 4. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types