Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;187(1):215-224.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06049-8. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer "intrinsic" molecular subtypes

Affiliations

Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer "intrinsic" molecular subtypes

Geffen Kleinstern et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the association of percent mammographic density (PMD), absolute dense area (DA), and non-dense area (NDA) with risk of "intrinsic" molecular breast cancer (BC) subtypes.

Methods: We pooled 3492 invasive BC and 10,148 controls across six studies with density measures from prediagnostic, digitized film-screen mammograms. We classified BC tumors into subtypes [63% Luminal A, 21% Luminal B, 5% HER2 expressing, and 11% as triple negative (TN)] using information on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and tumor grade. We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for density measures (per SD) across the subtypes compared to controls, adjusting for age, body mass index and study, and examined differences by age group.

Results: All density measures were similarly associated with BC risk across subtypes. Significant interaction of PMD by age (P = 0.001) was observed for Luminal A tumors, with stronger effect sizes seen for younger women < 45 years (OR = 1.69 per SD PMD) relative to women of older ages (OR = 1.53, ages 65-74, OR = 1.44 ages 75 +). Similar but opposite trends were seen for NDA by age for risk of Luminal A: risk for women: < 45 years (OR = 0.71 per SD NDA) was lower than older women (OR = 0.83 and OR = 0.84 for ages 65-74 and 75 + , respectively) (P < 0.001). Although not significant, similar patterns of associations were seen by age for TN cancers.

Conclusions: Mammographic density measures were associated with risk of all "intrinsic" molecular subtypes. However, findings of significant interactions between age and density measures may have implications for subtype-specific risk models.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Mammographic density; “Intrinsic” molecular subtypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Associations of continuous PMD (a), DA (b), and NDA (c) for risk of ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes (HER2 expressing, Luminal A, Luminal B, and TN) by age group
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Associations of continuous PMD (a), DA (b), and NDA (c) for risk of ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes (HER2 expressing, Luminal A, Luminal B, and TN) by age group

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006. 15(6):1159–1169. - PubMed
    1. Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg L, Humphreys K, Hall P. The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012. 134(2):859–866. - PubMed
    1. Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Rosner B, Vachon C, Tamimi RM. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. 103(15):1179–1189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen JH, Hsu FT, Shih HN, Hsu CC, Chang D, Nie K, Nalcioglu O, Su MY. Does breast density show difference in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer measured on MRI? Ann Oncol. 2009. 20(8):1447–1449. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eriksson L, Hall P, Czene K, dos Santos Silva I, McCormack V, Bergh J, Bjohle J, Ploner A. Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012. 107(1):18–23. - PMC - PubMed