Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;76(Pt 12):1192-1200.
doi: 10.1107/S2059798320013170. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

Shift-field refinement of macromolecular atomic models

K Cowtan  1 , S Metcalfe  2 , P Bond  1
Affiliations

Shift-field refinement of macromolecular atomic models

K Cowtan et al. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. .

Abstract

The aim of crystallographic structure solution is typically to determine an atomic model which accurately accounts for an observed diffraction pattern. A key step in this process is the refinement of the parameters of an initial model, which is most often determined by molecular replacement using another structure which is broadly similar to the structure of interest. In macromolecular crystallography, the resolution of the data is typically insufficient to determine the positional and uncertainty parameters for each individual atom, and so stereochemical information is used to supplement the observational data. Here, a new approach to refinement is evaluated in which a `shift field' is determined which describes changes to model parameters affecting whole regions of the model rather than individual atoms only, with the size of the affected region being a key parameter of the calculation which can be changed in accordance with the resolution of the data. It is demonstrated that this approach can improve the radius of convergence of the refinement calculation while also dramatically reducing the calculation time.

Keywords: computational methods; low resolution; refinement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the free R factor after the various refinement procedures. (a) Jelly-body refinement compared with conventional refinement alone. (b) Shift-field refinement compared with conventional refinement alone. (c) Shift-field refinement compared with jelly-body refinement. Points below the diagonal indicate a better result for the method on the y axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the free R factor after shift-field plus conventional refinement with the shift-field regression calculation either including (y axis) or omitting (x axis) the constant term.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the root-mean-square difference in Cα coordinate positions between matched residues of the refined molecular-replacement model and the refined deposited structure under different refinement protocols. (a) Jelly-body refinement compared with conventional refinement alone. (b) Shift-field refinement compared with conventional refinement alone. (c) Shift-field refinement compared with jelly-body refinement. Points below the diagonal indicate a better result for the method on the y axis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of the distribution of r.m.s.d. values over the 452 test structures between the initial model and models refined using the conventional, jelly-body and shift-field refinement protocols (a) and between the refined models and the deposited structure (b). The distributions are binned in steps of 0.2 Å but are plotted with lines for ease of comparison.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparative CPU times (in seconds) for the three refinement protocols averaged over 160 structures between 1.0 and 1.5 Å resolution and 90 structures between 2.5 and 3.5 Å resolution. Results are given for shift-field refinement alone (without the conventional refinement step), for 200 cycles of jelly-body refinement in REFMAC5 and for 20 cycles of conventional refinement in REFMAC5. The least-squares linear fit of time against unit-cell volume is shown for each method and resolution range, with scatter points shown for the low-resolution subsets.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of a section through models for PDB entry 4l9m, showing the Cα trace of the jelly-body refined model (thick dark bonds), the shift-field refinement model (thick light bonds) and the deposited model (thin bonds).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of models for PDB entry 2d66 showing the Cα trace of the jelly-body refined model (thick dark bonds), the shift-field refinement model (thick light bonds) and the deposited model (thin bonds). Some loops have been removed for clarity. Symmetry contacts of the deposited model are also shown (thin light bonds).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • MUT-7 exoribonuclease activity and localization are mediated by an ancient domain.
    Busetto V, Pshanichnaya L, Lichtenberger R, Hann S, Ketting RF, Falk S. Busetto V, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Aug 27;52(15):9076-9091. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae610. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024. PMID: 39188014 Free PMC article.
  • AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination.
    Terwilliger TC, Liebschner D, Croll TI, Williams CJ, McCoy AJ, Poon BK, Afonine PV, Oeffner RD, Richardson JS, Read RJ, Adams PD. Terwilliger TC, et al. Nat Methods. 2024 Jan;21(1):110-116. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02087-4. Epub 2023 Nov 30. Nat Methods. 2024. PMID: 38036854 Free PMC article.
  • An intact S-layer is advantageous to Clostridioides difficile within the host.
    Ormsby MJ, Vaz F, Kirk JA, Barwinska-Sendra A, Hallam JC, Lanzoni-Mangutchi P, Cole J, Chaudhuri RR, Salgado PS, Fagan RP, Douce GR. Ormsby MJ, et al. PLoS Pathog. 2023 Jun 29;19(6):e1011015. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011015. eCollection 2023 Jun. PLoS Pathog. 2023. PMID: 37384772 Free PMC article.
  • The CCP4 suite: integrative software for macromolecular crystallography.
    Agirre J, Atanasova M, Bagdonas H, Ballard CB, Baslé A, Beilsten-Edmands J, Borges RJ, Brown DG, Burgos-Mármol JJ, Berrisford JM, Bond PS, Caballero I, Catapano L, Chojnowski G, Cook AG, Cowtan KD, Croll TI, Debreczeni JÉ, Devenish NE, Dodson EJ, Drevon TR, Emsley P, Evans G, Evans PR, Fando M, Foadi J, Fuentes-Montero L, Garman EF, Gerstel M, Gildea RJ, Hatti K, Hekkelman ML, Heuser P, Hoh SW, Hough MA, Jenkins HT, Jiménez E, Joosten RP, Keegan RM, Keep N, Krissinel EB, Kolenko P, Kovalevskiy O, Lamzin VS, Lawson DM, Lebedev AA, Leslie AGW, Lohkamp B, Long F, Malý M, McCoy AJ, McNicholas SJ, Medina A, Millán C, Murray JW, Murshudov GN, Nicholls RA, Noble MEM, Oeffner R, Pannu NS, Parkhurst JM, Pearce N, Pereira J, Perrakis A, Powell HR, Read RJ, Rigden DJ, Rochira W, Sammito M, Sánchez Rodríguez F, Sheldrick GM, Shelley KL, Simkovic F, Simpkin AJ, Skubak P, Sobolev E, Steiner RA, Stevenson K, Tews I, Thomas JMH, Thorn A, Valls JT, Uski V, Usón I, Vagin A, Velankar S, Vollmar M, Walden H, Waterman D, Wilson KS, Winn MD, Winter G, Wojdyr M, Yamashita K. Agirre J, et al. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2023 Jun 1;79(Pt 6):449-461. doi: 10.1107/S2059798323003595. Epub 2023 May 30. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2023. PMID: 37259835 Free PMC article.
  • Improved AlphaFold modeling with implicit experimental information.
    Terwilliger TC, Poon BK, Afonine PV, Schlicksup CJ, Croll TI, Millán C, Richardson JS, Read RJ, Adams PD. Terwilliger TC, et al. Nat Methods. 2022 Nov;19(11):1376-1382. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01645-6. Epub 2022 Oct 20. Nat Methods. 2022. PMID: 36266465 Free PMC article.
See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Afonine, P. V., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Mustyakimov, M., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A., Zwart, P. H. & Adams, P. D. (2012). Acta Cryst. D68, 352–367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal, R., Lifchitz, A. & Dodson, E. (1981). In Proceedings of the CCP4 Study Weekend. Refinement of Protein Structures, edited by P. A. Machin, J. W. Campbell & M. Elder. Warrington: Daresbury Laboratory.
    1. Berman, H., Henrick, K., Nakamura, H. & Markley, J. (2007). Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D301–D303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanc, E., Roversi, P., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Lea, S. M. & Bricogne, G. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2210–2221. - PubMed
    1. Bond, P. S., Wilson, K. S. & Cowtan, K. D. (2020). Acta Cryst. D76, 713–723. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances