Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 2;9(12):6.
doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.12.6. eCollection 2020 Nov.

A Novel Topical Ophthalmic Formulation to Mitigate Acute Mustard Gas Keratopathy In Vivo: A Pilot Study

Ratnakar Tripathi  1   2 , Praveen K Balne  1   2 , Nishant R Sinha  1   2 , Lynn M Martin  1   2 , Sabeeh Kamil  1   2 , James R Landreneau  1   3 , Suneel Gupta  1   2 , Jason T Rodier  1   3 , Prashant R Sinha  1   2 , Nathan P Hesemann  1   3 , Alexandria C Hofmann  2   3 , Michael K Fink  1   2 , Shyam S Chaurasia  1   2 , Rajiv R Mohan  1   2   3
Affiliations

A Novel Topical Ophthalmic Formulation to Mitigate Acute Mustard Gas Keratopathy In Vivo: A Pilot Study

Ratnakar Tripathi et al. Transl Vis Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Purpose: This pilot study investigated the in vivo therapeutic potential and tolerability of a multimodal ophthalmic formulation, topical eye drops (TED), for acute mustard gas keratopathy (MGK) using a rabbit model.

Methods: Twenty New Zealand White rabbits were used. Only right eyes of 18 rabbits (oculus dexter [OD]) received single sulfur mustard gas (SM) vapor injury, whereas contralateral eyes were left untreated or received TED for tolerabilty evaluation. Two rabbit eyes received no treatment and served as age-matched naive control. The four groups were: Naive (oculus sinister [OS] untreated eyes; n = 9); TED (OS treated only with TED BID for 3 days; n = 9); SM (OD exposed to SM vapor; n = 9); and SM+TED (OD exposed to SM+TED BID for 3 days; n = 9). Ocular examination in live rabbits were performed utilizing slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Fantes grading system, fluorescein staining, Schirmer's tests, pachymetry, and applanation tonometry. Cellular and molecular changes in rabbit corneas were assessed after humane euthanasia on day-3 and day-7 with histopathological and real-time polymerase chain reaction PCR techniques.

Results: TED to rabbit eyes was found tolerable in vivo. SM-exposed eyes showed significant increase in Fantes scores, central corneal thickness (CCT), Schirmer's test, epithelium-stroma separation, and corneal edema. TED mitigated clinical symptoms by reducing corneal edema, Fantes scores, CCT, and Schirmer's test. Further, TED decreased SM-induced corneal haze, inflammatory and profibrotic markers, transforming growth factor-TGF-β1 and cyclooxygenase-2COX-2, and damage to corneal structure, including epithelial-stromal integrity.

Conclusions: The developed multimodal eyedrop formulation, TED, has potential to mitigate acute MGK effectively in vivo.

Translational relevance: TED is effective against MGK.

Keywords: cornea; corneal edema; intraocular pressure; ocular inflammation; sulfur mustard.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: R. Tripathi, None; P.K. Balne, None; N.R. Sinha, None; L.M. Martin, None; S. Kamil, None; J.R. Landreneau, None; S. Gupta, None; J.T. Rodier, None; P.R. Sinha, None; N.P. Hesemann, None; A.C. Hofmann, None; M.K. Fink, None; S.S. Chaurasia, None; R.R. Mohan, None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Representative fluorescein dye test images showing the extent/area of corneal epithelial erosion/defect in rabbit eyes. SM-vapor severely damaged corneal epithelium at day-3 (C, arrowheads) and day-7 (G, arrowhead), and topical TED effectively reduced SM toxicity on day-3 (D, arrows) and day-7 (H, arrow). TED dosing to SM-unexposed eye did not show any damage to the corneal epithelium at day-3 (B) or day-7 (F), and corneal health was akin to the na10ve eyes at day-3 (A) and day-7 (E). Scale bar: 2.0 mm.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Representative slit-lamp narrow beam images exhibiting that SM-vapor caused inflammation in rabbit cornea at day-3 (C, arrowhead) and day-7 (G, arrowhead). TED decreased SM-induced corneal toxicity in vivo and reduced inflammation at day-3 (D, arrow) and day-7 (H, arrow). TED on SM-unexposed eye did not show any corneal inflammation at day-3 (B) or day-7 (F), and corneal health was similar to the naive corneas at day-3 (A) and day-7 (E). Scale bar: 2.0 mm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Representative stereo biomicroscopy digital images describing corneal opacity. SM-vapor caused severe corneal haze in rabbits in vivo at day-3 (C, arrowhead) and day-7 (G, arrowhead). TEDs diminished SM-induced corneal haze at day-3 (D, arrow) and day-7 (H, arrow). TED on SM-unexposed eye did not generate any corneal haze or inflammation at day-3 (B) or day-7 (F) and showed ocular health akin to the naive corneas at day-3 (A) and day-7 (E). Scale bar: 2.0 mm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Quantification of mean corneal haze using the Fantes score in naive, TED, SM, and SM+TED. The corneal haze score was significantly increased in rabbit eyes after SM exposure compared to the naive and decreased in the SM+TED as compared to the SM exposure at day-3, and day-7. The TED alone treatment to the cornea did not cause corneal haze and scored 0.00 at the Fantes scale. Results are expressed as Mean ± SEM (****p < 0.0001 **p = 0.0014, and *p = 0.0344, One-way ANOVA).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Representative H&E stained images showing that SM-vapor caused severe corneal edema in rabbits in vivo at day-3 (C) and day-7 (G). TEDs attenuated SM-induced edema at day-3 (D) and day-7 (H). TED on SM-unexposed eye did not cause corneal edema or structural abnormalities at day-3 (B) or day-7 (F) and showed corneal morphology akin to the naive corneas at day-3 (A) and day-7 (E). e, epithelium, s, stroma, en, endothelium. Scale bar: 100 µM.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Representative H&E stained images displaying that SM-vapor caused severe epithelium-stroma separation in rabbits in vivo at day-3 (C, arrowheads) and day-7 (G, arrowheads). TEDs diminished SM-induced epithelium-stroma separation at day-3 (D, arrows) and day-7 (H, arrows). TED on SM-unexposed eye did not generate any corneal epithelium-stroma separation at day-3 (B) or day-7 (F) and showed corneal composition analogous to the naive corneas at day-3 (A) and day-7 (E). Scale bar: 100 µM.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Representative immunofluorescence images stained with anti-Integrin-β4 antibody indicating that SM-vapor caused severe corneal epithelium-stroma separation in rabbits in vivo at day-3 (C, arrowheads) and day-7 (G, arrowheads). TEDs mitigated epithelium-stroma separation at day-3 (D, arrows) and day-7 (H, arrows). TED on SM-unexposed eye did not alter corneal epithelium-stromal integrity at day-3 (B, arrows) or day-7 (F, arrows) and showed corneal composition analogous to the naive corneas at day-3 (A, arrows) and day-7 (E, arrows). Scale bar: 100 µM.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Quantitative gene expression analysis. (A) qRT-PCR analysis results showing upregulation of the TGF-β1 expression in SM-exposed corneas compared with naive at day-3 and day-7. TED treatment to the SM-exposed corneas downregulates TGF-β1 expression compared with SM-exposed at day-7 postexposure but not at day-3 (***P = 0.0002, **P = 0.0027, ns = no significance, one-way ANOVA). No significant changes in the expression of profibrotic marker, TGF-β1 gene in TED vs. naive rabbits at day-3 and day-7 (P > 0.05). (B) qRT-PCR analysis showing significant upregulation of the COX-2 in SM-exposed corneas compared with naive. SM+TED corneas showed downregulation of COX-2 expression compared with SM on day-3 and day-7 postexposure. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (****P < 0.0001, ***P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA). No significant change in the expression of inflammatory marker COX-2 gene in TED versus naive rabbit corneas at day-3 and day-7 (P > 0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wattana M, Bey T. Mustard gas or sulfur mustard: an old chemical agent as a new terrorist threat. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009; 24: 19–29. - PubMed
    1. Kilic E, Ortatatli M, Sezigen S, Eyison RK, Kenar L. Acute intensive care unit management of mustard gas victims: the Turkish experience. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018; 37: 332–337. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg MI, Sexton KJ, Vearrier D. Sea-dumped chemical weapons: environmental risk, occupational hazard. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016; 54: 79–91. - PubMed
    1. Renshaw B. Observation on the role of water in the susceptibility of human skin to injury by vesicant vapors. J Invest Dermatol. 1947; 9: 75–85. - PubMed
    1. Emad A, Rezaian GH.. Immunoglobulins and cellular constituents of the BAL fluid of patients with sulfur mustard gas-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 1999; 115: 346–351. - PubMed

Publication types