Factors associated with study protocol adherence and bio banking participation in reproductive medicine clinical trials and their relationship to live birth
- PMID: 33190149
- PMCID: PMC8453415
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa232
Factors associated with study protocol adherence and bio banking participation in reproductive medicine clinical trials and their relationship to live birth
Abstract
Study question: What demographic and baseline characteristics are predictive of adherence to reproductive medicine clinical trial protocols, live birth or participation in genetic studies?
Summary answer: Race, BMI and lower income are associated with likelihood of non-adherent to reproductive medicine clinical trial protocols, while race influences collection of biological samples and non-adherent to study protocols is associated with lower probability of live birth.
What is known already: Although aspects of adherence to study protocol have previously been evaluated as individual factors in infertile women, the factors that affect overall non-adherent to study protocol have not been previously evaluated.
Study design, size, duration: A secondary data analysis of 1650 participants from two prospective multicenter, double-blind controlled studies was carried out: Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II (PPCOS II) and Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation (AMIGOS).
Participants/materials, setting, methods: The participants were women aged 18-40 years old with either polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with ovulatory dysfunction in combination with either hyperandrogenemia and/or polycystic ovarian morphology (PPCOS II), or regular ovulatory cycles with unexplained infertility (AMIGOS). The study was carried out in 14 clinical sites in the USA. Non-adherence to clinical trial protocol was chosen as the primary outcome for this analysis. To evaluate whether demographic and baseline characteristics were predictive of adherence to study protocols, live birth or participation in blood sampling for DNA and repository, and pregnancy registry, these putative factors were compared between the outcome measures. Logistic regression was used to establish a prediction model using the putative predictors introduced above.
Main results and the role of chance: Women who self-identified as African American or Asian and those with higher BMI and lower household income were less likely to adhere to protocol. Non-adherence to the study protocol was associated with a lower probability of live birth (odds ratio: 0.180, 95% CI: 0.120, 0.272, P < 0.001). African Americans or Asians were less likely to participate in optional study DNA collection compared to Whites. Participants who were African American or with high annual income or from the Southwest sites or had PCOS were less likely to participate in the blood repository studies.
Limitations, reasons for caution: Race and ethnicity were self-reported and such self-classification to strict race and ethnicity may not always be representative of a whole racial or ethnic group. This study included two US multicenter trials and therefore the findings may not be extrapolated to international trials.
Wider implications of the findings: Identification of populations with low participation is an important initial step, as further investigation can develop specific measures to improve adherence to study protocols and participation in biospecimen banking and thereby extend the representativeness of reproductive medicine clinical trial findings.
Study funding/competing interest(s): Supported by NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Grants: U10 HD39005, U10 HD38992, U10 HD27049, U10 HD38998, U10 HD055942, HD055944, U10 HD055936, U10HD055925, PPCOSII: U10 HD27049, U10 HD38992, U10 HD055925, U10 HD39005, U10 HD38998, U10 HD055936, U10 HD055942, U10 HD055944; Clinical Reproductive Endocrine Scientist Training Program (CREST): R25HD075737. Outside this study, M.P.D. received NIH/NIHCD research grant and R.S.L. received research grant from Ferring and was consultant for Bayer, Kindex, Odega, Millendo and AbbVie.
Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00719186; NCT01044862.
Keywords: adherence to study protocol; biospecimen banking; dropout; ethnicity; live birth; medication compliance; non-adherence; pregnancy registry; race; randomized controlled trial.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Intrauterine insemination performance characteristics and post-processing total motile sperm count in relation to live birth for couples with unexplained infertility in a randomised, multicentre clinical trial.Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):1296-1305. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa027. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32432326 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Identification and replication of prediction models for ovulation, pregnancy and live birth in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2222-33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev182. Epub 2015 Jul 22. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26202922 Free PMC article.
-
Allostatic load, a measure of chronic physiological stress, is associated with pregnancy outcomes, but not fertility, among women with unexplained infertility.Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1757-1766. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey261. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 30085177 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) for ovulation induction in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 27;9(9):CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36165742 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Aromatase inhibitors for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 24;(2):CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 24;5:CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub3 PMID: 24563180 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reprod Sci. 2023 Aug;30(8):2373-2396. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Reprod Sci. 2023. PMID: 37099229 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bailey JM, Bieniasz ME, Kmak D, Brenner DE, Ruffin MT. Recruitment and retention of economically underserved women to a cervical cancer prevention trial. Appl Nurs Res 2004;17:55–60. - PubMed
-
- Bowen D, Raczynski J, George V, Feng Z, Fouad M. The role of participation in the Women’s Health Trial: feasibility study in minority populations. Prev Med 2000;31:474–480. - PubMed
-
- Brandt AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Hastings Cent Rep 1978;8:21–29. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials