Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020;21(11):871-884.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2000355.

Effects of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells: environmental factors affecting cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation and their mechanisms

Affiliations
Review

Effects of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells: environmental factors affecting cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation and their mechanisms

Dan Yu et al. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020.

Abstract

Nanofibers can mimic natural tissue structure by creating a more suitable environment for cells to grow, prompting a wide application of nanofiber materials. In this review, we include relevant studies and characterize the effect of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells, as well as factors that affect cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation. We hypothesize that the process of bone regeneration in vitro is similar to bone formation and healing in vivo, and the closer nanofibers or nanofibrous scaffolds are to natural bone tissue, the better the bone regeneration process will be. In general, cells cultured on nanofibers have a similar gene expression pattern and osteogenic behavior as cells induced by osteogenic supplements in vitro. Genes involved in cell adhesion (focal adhesion kinase (FAK)), cytoskeletal organization, and osteogenic pathways (transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/bone morphogenic protein (BMP), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Wnt) are upregulated successively. Cell adhesion and osteogenesis may be influenced by several factors. Nanofibers possess certain physical properties including favorable hydrophilicity, porosity, and swelling properties that promote cell adhesion and growth. Moreover, nanofiber stiffness plays a vital role in cell fate, as cell recruitment for osteogenesis tends to be better on stiffer scaffolds, with associated signaling pathways of integrin and Yes-associated protein (YAP)/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). Also, hierarchically aligned nanofibers, as well as their combination with functional additives (growth factors, HA particles, etc.), contribute to osteogenesis and bone regeneration. In summary, previous studies have indicated that upon sensing the stiffness of the nanofibrous environment as well as its other characteristics, stem cells change their shape and tension accordingly, regulating downstream pathways followed by adhesion to nanofibers to contribute to osteogenesis. However, additional experiments are needed to identify major signaling pathways in the bone regeneration process, and also to fully investigate its supportive role in fabricating or designing the optimum tissue-mimicking nanofibrous scaffolds.

Keywords: Nanofiber; Stem cell; Mimicking natural tissue; Morphology; Signaling pathway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethics guidelines: Dan YU, Jin WANG, Ke-jia QIAN, Jing YU, and Hui-yong ZHU declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Factors affecting stem cell behavior on nanofibers Cells with osteogenic tendency are more spindle-shaped. (a) The stiffness of environment affects cell fate. A stiff matrix (below) leads to more osteogenesis compared with a soft matrix (up). (b) The alignment of nanofibers affects cell fate. Stem cells cultured on aligned nanofibers are consistent with the direction of the fibers and have better osteogenesis (below) compared with random nanofibers (up). (c) The hierarchical structure of nanofibrous scaffolds affects cell adhesion and differentiation. Compared with simple scaffolds (up), scaffolds with nanofibers aligned differently on each layer mimic natural tissue better, leading to improved osteogenesis by cells (below). (d) Pore volume in nanofibrous scaffolds affects cell adhesion and growth. Compared with cells growing in overlarge pores (up), cells have better adhesion and interconnectivity when the pore size fits the cell size (below). (e) Functional additives aid cell growth. Scaffolds combined with various nanoparticles and growth factors provide better cell osteogenesis (below) compared with pure scaffolds (up). MSC: mesenchymal stem cell
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Model of the effect of nanofibers on stem cells Stem cells sense the stiffness and other characteristics of nanofibers, change their shape and cell tension accordingly, and regulate downstream pathways resulting in osteogenesis and bone regeneration

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abedin E, Lari R, Mahdavi Shahri N, et al. Development of a demineralized and decellularized human epiphyseal bone scaffold for tissue engineering: a histological study. Tissue Cell. 2018;55:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2018.09.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allori AC, Sailon AM, Warren SM. Biological basis of bone formation, remodeling, and repair–part II: extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part B: Rev. 2008;14(3):275–283. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0083. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andalib MN, Lee JS, Ha L, et al. The role of RhoA kinase (ROCK) in cell alignment on nanofibers. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(8):7737–7745. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andalib MN, Lee JS, Ha L, et al. Focal adhesion kinase regulation in stem cell alignment and spreading on nanofibers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;473(4):920–925. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arslan E, Hatip Koc M, Uysal O, et al. Supramolecular peptide nanofiber morphology affects mechanotransduction of stem cells. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(10):3114–3130. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00773. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances