Effects of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells: environmental factors affecting cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation and their mechanisms
- PMID: 33150771
- PMCID: PMC7691686
- DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2000355
Effects of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells: environmental factors affecting cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation and their mechanisms
Abstract
Nanofibers can mimic natural tissue structure by creating a more suitable environment for cells to grow, prompting a wide application of nanofiber materials. In this review, we include relevant studies and characterize the effect of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells, as well as factors that affect cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation. We hypothesize that the process of bone regeneration in vitro is similar to bone formation and healing in vivo, and the closer nanofibers or nanofibrous scaffolds are to natural bone tissue, the better the bone regeneration process will be. In general, cells cultured on nanofibers have a similar gene expression pattern and osteogenic behavior as cells induced by osteogenic supplements in vitro. Genes involved in cell adhesion (focal adhesion kinase (FAK)), cytoskeletal organization, and osteogenic pathways (transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/bone morphogenic protein (BMP), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Wnt) are upregulated successively. Cell adhesion and osteogenesis may be influenced by several factors. Nanofibers possess certain physical properties including favorable hydrophilicity, porosity, and swelling properties that promote cell adhesion and growth. Moreover, nanofiber stiffness plays a vital role in cell fate, as cell recruitment for osteogenesis tends to be better on stiffer scaffolds, with associated signaling pathways of integrin and Yes-associated protein (YAP)/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). Also, hierarchically aligned nanofibers, as well as their combination with functional additives (growth factors, HA particles, etc.), contribute to osteogenesis and bone regeneration. In summary, previous studies have indicated that upon sensing the stiffness of the nanofibrous environment as well as its other characteristics, stem cells change their shape and tension accordingly, regulating downstream pathways followed by adhesion to nanofibers to contribute to osteogenesis. However, additional experiments are needed to identify major signaling pathways in the bone regeneration process, and also to fully investigate its supportive role in fabricating or designing the optimum tissue-mimicking nanofibrous scaffolds.
Keywords: Nanofiber; Stem cell; Mimicking natural tissue; Morphology; Signaling pathway.
Conflict of interest statement
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Lower extent but similar rhythm of osteogenic behavior in hBMSCs cultured on nanofibrous scaffolds versus induced with osteogenic supplement.ACS Nano. 2013 Aug 27;7(8):6928-38. doi: 10.1021/nn402118s. Epub 2013 Aug 5. ACS Nano. 2013. PMID: 23906375
-
The promotion of bone regeneration by nanofibrous hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds by effects on integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway in BMSCs.Biomaterials. 2013 Jun;34(18):4404-17. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.048. Epub 2013 Mar 17. Biomaterials. 2013. PMID: 23515177
-
Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on poly(L-lactide) nanofibrous scaffolds containing carbon nanomaterials.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Apr;103(4):1424-35. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35283. Epub 2014 Aug 2. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015. PMID: 25046153
-
Design of electrospun nanofibrous mats for osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.Nanomedicine. 2018 Oct;14(7):2505-2520. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 May 26. Nanomedicine. 2018. PMID: 28554595 Review.
-
Mechanically induced osteogenic lineage commitment of stem cells.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4(5):107. doi: 10.1186/scrt318. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013. PMID: 24004875 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Novel PVA-Hyaluronan-Siloxane Hybrid Nanofiber Mats for Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers (Basel). 2024 Feb 11;16(4):497. doi: 10.3390/polym16040497. Polymers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38399875 Free PMC article.
-
Surface Modifications of High-Performance Polymer Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to Improve Its Biological Performance in Dentistry.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;14(24):5526. doi: 10.3390/polym14245526. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36559893 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biological scaffold as potential platforms for stem cells: Current development and applications in wound healing.World J Stem Cells. 2024 Apr 26;16(4):334-352. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v16.i4.334. World J Stem Cells. 2024. PMID: 38690516 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physical optimization of cell proliferation and differentiation using spinner flask and microcarriers.AMB Express. 2022 May 31;12(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13568-022-01397-8. AMB Express. 2022. PMID: 35639184 Free PMC article.
-
Non-coding RNA delivery for bone tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and potential solutions.iScience. 2022 Jul 20;25(8):104807. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104807. eCollection 2022 Aug 19. iScience. 2022. PMID: 35992068 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous