Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 22;66(6):555-562.
doi: 10.1262/jrd.2020-086. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

Carnosic acid improves porcine early embryonic development by inhibiting the accumulation of reactive oxygen species

Yan-Xia Peng  1 , Cheng-Zhen Chen  1 , Dan Luo  1 , Wen-Jie Yu  1 , Sheng-Peng Li  1 , Yue Xiao  1 , Bao Yuan  1 , Shuang Liang  1 , Xue-Rui Yao  2 , Nam-Hyung Kim  1   2 , Hao Jiang  1   2 , Jia-Bao Zhang  1
Affiliations

Carnosic acid improves porcine early embryonic development by inhibiting the accumulation of reactive oxygen species

Yan-Xia Peng et al. J Reprod Dev. .

Abstract

Carnosic acid (CA), a natural catechol rosin diterpene, is used as an additive in animal feeds and human foods. However, the effects of CA on mammalian reproductive processes, especially early embryonic development, are unclear. In this study, we added CA to parthenogenetically activated porcine embryos in an in vitro culture medium to explore the influence of CA on apoptosis, proliferation, blastocyst formation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, glutathione (GSH) levels, mitochondrial membrane potential, and embryonic development-related gene expression. The results showed that supplementation with 10 μM CA during in vitro culture significantly improved the cleavage rates, blastocyst formation rates, hatching rates, and total numbers of cells of parthenogenetically activated porcine embryos compared with no supplementation. More importantly, supplementation with CA also improved GSH levels and mitochondrial membrane potential, reduced natural ROS levels in blastomeres, upregulated Nanog, Sox2, Gata4, Cox2, Itga5, and Rictor expression, and downregulated Birc5 and Caspase3 expression. These results suggest that CA can improve early porcine embryonic development by regulating oxidative stress. This study elucidates the effects of CA on early embryonic development and their potential mechanisms, and provides new applications for improving the quality of in vitro-developed embryos.

Keywords: Antioxidant; Carnosic acid; Embryo development; Oxidative stress; Porcine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding the contents of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Blastocyst rates on Day 5 and Day 6 after treatment with different carnosic acid (CA) concentrations. (A) Embryonic development on Day 5 and Day 6 after treatment with different CA concentrations. Scale bar = 400 μm. (B) Blastocyst rates in the groups treated with 0 μM (n = 160), 5 μM (n = 173), 10 μM (n = 180), 25 μM (n = 182), and 50 μM (n = 168) CA. R = 3. Significant differences are represented with ** (P < 0.01).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Effects of carnosic acid (CA) on the development of parthenogenetic embryos. (A) Embryonic development in the negative control (NC) and CA-treated groups on different days. Scale bar = 400 μm. (B) Cleavage rates of embryos in the NC group (n = 214) and the CA-treated group (n = 217). R = 4. (C) Blastocyst formation rates in the NC group (n = 254) and the CA-treated group (n = 298) on different days. R = 5. (D) Average diameters of blastocysts on Day 6 in the NC group (n = 107) and the CA-treated group (n = 133). R = 4. Plot depicting the distributions of embryo diameter for black dots in the NC and CA-treated groups. (E) Hatching rates in the NC group (n = 254) and the CA-treated group (n = 298). R = 5. Significant differences are represented with * (P < 0.05) and ** (P < 0.01).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Total cell numbers and apoptotic nuclei in blastocysts with or without carnosic acid (CA) treatment. (A) Apoptotic nuclei in the negative control (NC) and CA-treated groups. The white arrows indicate nuclei positively stained for apoptosis. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) and (C) Total cell numbers and apoptosis rates in blastocysts with (n = 57) or without (n = 73) CA treatment, respectively. R = 3. Black dots represent the tested values. Significant differences are represented with * (P < 0.05) and ** (P < 0.01).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Effects of carnosic acid (CA) on oxidation resistance in 4-cell-stage embryos. (A) Fluorescence intensity of H2DCFDA staining in different groups. Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Fluorescence intensity of CMF2HC staining in the negative control (NC) and CA-treated groups. Scale bar = 200 μm. (C) Relative reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in 4-cell-stage embryos. Plot depicting the distributions of relative embryo ROS levels for blue (n = 86), green (n = 104), red (n = 90), and orange (n = 74)-colored dots in different groups. Significant differences are represented with different capital letters (P < 0.01). R = 5. (D) Relative GSH levels of 4-cell-stage embryos in the NC (n = 91) and CA-treated (n = 93) groups. R = 3. Significant differences are represented with different capital letters (P < 0.01) and ** (P < 0.01).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Carnosic acid (CA) enhances mitochondrial activity. (A) JC-1 staining in 4-cell-stage embryos with or without CA treatment. (B) Relative fluorescence levels of JC-1 in the negative control (NC) (n = 126) and CA-treated (n = 140) groups. R = 5. Black dots represent the tested values. Scale bar = 100 μm. Significant differences are represented with ** (P < 0.01).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Differential gene expression in blastocysts. Gene expression levels were analyzed in porcine blastocysts with or without carnosic acid (CA) treatment on Day 7. Significant differences are represented with * (P < 0.05) and ** (P < 0.01).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Loren P, Sánchez R, Arias M-E, Felmer R, Risopatrón J, Cheuquemán C. Melatonin scavenger properties against oxidative and nitrosative stress: impact on gamete handling and in vitro embryo production in humans and other mammals. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18: 1119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, du Plessis SS. Utility of antioxidants during assisted reproductive techniques: an evidence based review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Opiela J, Samiec M. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells and their application in experimental embryology. Pol J Vet Sci 2013; 16: 593–599. - PubMed
    1. Hryhorowicz M, Zeyland J, Słomski R, Lipiński D. Genetically modified pigs as organ donors for xenotransplantation. Mol Biotechnol 2017; 59: 435–444. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callesen MM, Árnadóttir SS, Lyskjaer I, Ørntoft MW, Høyer S, Dagnaes-Hansen F, Liu Y, Li R, Callesen H, Rasmussen MH, Berthelsen MF, Thomsen MK, Schweiger PJ, Jensen KB, Laurberg S, Ørntoft TF, Elverløv-Jakobsen JE, Andersen CL. A genetically inducible porcine model of intestinal cancer. Mol Oncol 2017; 11: 1616–1629. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms