Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
- PMID: 33041578
- PMCID: PMC7518498
- DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_70_19
Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study
Abstract
Background: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic, debilitating disease characterized by juxtaepithelial fibrosis. The present study evaluates the efficacy of buccal fat pad (BFP) and bovine collagen membrane as reconstruction options.
Materials and methods: The sample size includes 22 patients between 20 and 60 years, randomly distributed in two groups: Group I in which BFP was used and Group II where BFP with bovine collagen membrane was used after surgical resection of fibrotic bands. The clinical evaluation on postoperative 1st, 3rd, and 5th days and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 12th, and 24th weeks subsequently.
Results: The mean age in Group I was 27.17 ± 3.157 years and Group II was 37.90 ± 6.657 years. The mean preoperative mouth opening was 9.75 ± 6.717 and 8.90 ± 3.784 mm in Groups I and II, respectively. The mean duration of presenting illness in Group I was 9.75 ± 2.598 years and in Group II was 8.80 ± 1.989 years. There was no significant difference observed between Groups I and II in relation to reduced mouth opening and duration of symptoms (P > 0.05) except for age. No significant difference was observed between both the groups in relation to preoperative pain, burning sensation, cheek stiffness, mucosal suppleness, postoperative infection, and postoperative pain at days 1 and 5 and 1st week. There was a significant difference observed in postoperative pain among both the groups on the 3rd day and 2nd week.
Conclusion: In the present study, both the groups have proved to give better results, as BFP in the form of interposition material showed rapid epithelization and minimum wound contracture.
Keywords: Bovine collagen membrane; buccal pad of fat; mouth opening; oral submucous fibrosis.
Copyright: © 2020 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/7518498/469486051134/NJMS-11-57-g001.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/7518498/1ed836e0cddc/NJMS-11-57-g002.gif)
![Graph 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/7518498/5ed847f1257c/NJMS-11-57-g003.gif)
Similar articles
-
A Comparative Evaluation between the Use of Buccal Pad of Fat and Bovine Collagen Membrane in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S190-S193. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_654_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021. PMID: 34447073 Free PMC article.
-
Collagen Membrane Over Buccal Fat Pad Versus Buccal Fat Pad in Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Comparative Prospective Study.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Dec;17(4):482-487. doi: 10.1007/s12663-017-1041-8. Epub 2017 Sep 11. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018. PMID: 30344390 Free PMC article.
-
Use of buccal fat pad for treatment of oral submucous fibrosis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;70(1):228-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.089. Epub 2011 May 6. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 21549481
-
Comparative evaluation of nasolabial flap and buccal fat pad flap in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Mar;28(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01157-3. Epub 2023 May 23. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024. PMID: 37219705 Review.
-
What is the Optimal Reconstructive Option for Oral Submucous Fibrosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Buccal Pad of Fat Versus Conventional Nasolabial and Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Platysma Myocutaneous Flap.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Dec;19(4):490-497. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01373-4. Epub 2020 May 5. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020. PMID: 33071494 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Nasolabial Flap in the Management of Oral Sub Mucous Fibrosis: A Series of Cases.Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2023 Aug 3;16:11795476231191030. doi: 10.1177/11795476231191030. eCollection 2023. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37547486 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Evaluation between the Use of Buccal Pad of Fat and Bovine Collagen Membrane in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S190-S193. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_654_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021. PMID: 34447073 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 28;2(2):CD007156. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007156.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38415846 Review.
-
Efficacy of Collagen Membrane Graft in Intraoral Surgery - An Evaluative Study.Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan-Jun;11(1):42-48. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_192_20. Epub 2021 Jul 24. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021. PMID: 34522653 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rajalalitha P, Vali S. Molecular pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis – A collagen metabolic disorder. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34:321–8. - PubMed
-
- Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM. Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966;22:764–79. - PubMed
-
- Pindborg JJ, Zheng KH, Kong CR, Lin F ×. Pilot survey of oral mucosa in areca (betel) nut chewers on Hainan Island of the People's Republic of China. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984;12:195–6. - PubMed
-
- Kramer IR, Pindborg JJ, Bezroukov V, Infirri JS. Guide to epidemiology and diagnosis of oral mucosal diseases and conditions. World Health Organization. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980;8:1–26. - PubMed
-
- Joshi SG. Submucous fibrosis of the palate and pillars. Indian J Otolaryngol. 1953;4:l–4.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous