Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2299-2311.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049981. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Cardiovascular Events and Atherosclerotic Plaque

Affiliations

Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Cardiovascular Events and Atherosclerotic Plaque

Zsofia D Drobni et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treat an expanding range of cancers. Consistent basic data suggest that these same checkpoints are critical negative regulators of atherosclerosis. Therefore, our objectives were to test whether ICIs were associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and a higher risk of atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular events.

Methods: The study was situated in a single academic medical center. The primary analysis evaluated whether exposure to an ICI was associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in 2842 patients and 2842 controls matched by age, a history of cardiovascular events, and cancer type. In a second design, a case-crossover analysis was performed with an at-risk period defined as the 2-year period after and the control period as the 2-year period before treatment. The primary outcome was a composite of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke). Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome. In addition, in an imaging substudy (n=40), the rate of atherosclerotic plaque progression was compared from before to after the ICI was started. All study measures and outcomes were blindly adjudicated.

Results: In the matched cohort study, there was a 3-fold higher risk for cardiovascular events after starting an ICI (hazard ratio, 3.3 [95% CI, 2.0-5.5]; P<0.001). There was a similar increase in each of the individual components of the primary outcome. In the case-crossover, there was also an increase in cardiovascular events from 1.37 to 6.55 per 100 person-years at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.8 [95% CI, 3.5-6.5]; P<0.001). In the imaging study, the rate of progression of total aortic plaque volume was >3-fold higher with ICIs (from 2.1%/y before 6.7%/y after). This association between ICI use and increased atherosclerotic plaque progression was attenuated with concomitant use of statins or corticosteroids.

Conclusions: Cardiovascular events were higher after initiation of ICIs, potentially mediated by accelerated progression of atherosclerosis. Optimization of cardiovascular risk factors and increased awareness of cardiovascular risk before, during, and after treatment should be considered among patients on an ICI.

Keywords: atherosclerosis; immunomodulation; plaque, atherosclerotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Dr. Neilan has been a consultant to and received fees from Parexel Imaging, Intrinsic Imaging, H3-Biomedicine, AbbVie, and Syros Pharmaceuticals, outside of the current work. Dr. Neilan also reports consultant fees from Bristol Myers Squibb for a Scientific Advisory Board focused on myocarditis related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Dr. Hoffmann reports consulting fees from: Abbott, Duke University (NIH), Recor Medical; outside the submitted work. Dr. Sullivan has been a consultant to Asana, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Replimune; and received research funding from Amgen and Merck, all outside of the current work. Other authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan Meier curves of the cumulative hazard for atherosclerotic cardiovascular events.
Panel A shows the cumulative hazard for the composite cardiovascular outcome. The individual components of the primary outcome are also shown in Panel B, C and D. Cases (those treated with an ICI) are marked with red, and controls (not treated with an ICI) are marked with blue.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Cardiovascular events in the case-crossover study.
Panel A shows the composite cardiovascular outcomes in the two-year period pre-and post-immune checkpoint inhibitor. Panel A includes the cardiovascular event rates per 100 person years from two-year prior to the start of an immune checkpoint inhibitor to two-year after starting an immune checkpoint inhibitor. The individual components of the primary outcome are also shown. Panel B shows the composite cardiovascular outcomes in the one-year period pre-and post-immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ribas A and Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359:1350–1355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tang J, Shalabi A and Hubbard-Lucey VM. Comprehensive analysis of the clinical immuno-oncology landscape. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:84–91. - PubMed
    1. Haslam A and Prasad V. Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5);e192535. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, Haydon A, Lichinitser M, Khattak A, Carlino MS et al. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1789–1801. - PubMed
    1. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Yokoi T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M et al. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1919–1929. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances