Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay
- PMID: 32949663
- PMCID: PMC7493793
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay
Abstract
Objective: Low viral load from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during infection late stage easily lead to false negative nucleic acid testing results, thus having great challenges to the prevention and control of the current pandemic. In present study, we mainly aimed to evaluate specimen types and specimen collection timepoint on the positive detection of 2019 novel coronavirus from patients at infection late stage based on RT-PCR testing.
Methods: Paired nasopharyngeal swabs, nasal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs and anal swabs were collected from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during infection late stage before washing in the morning and afternoon on the same day. Then virus RNA was extracted and tested for 2019-nCoV identification by RT-PCR within 24 h.
Results: Viral load was low at late infection stage. Specimens collected before washing in the morning would increase the detection ratio of 2019-nCoV. Detection ratio of nasopharyngeal swab [65 (95 % CI: 49.51-77.87) vs 42.5(95 % CI: 28.51-57.8)] or nasal swab [57.5 (95 % CI: 42.2-71.49) vs 35 (95 % CI: 22.13-50.49)] is higher not only than oropharyngeal swab[22.5 (95 % CI: 12.32-37.5) vs 7.5 (95 % CI: 2.58-19.86)], but also anal swab[2.5 (95 % CI: 0.44-12.88) vs 5 (95 % CI: 1.38-16.5)].
Conclusions: In summary, our research discovers that nasopharyngeal or nasal swab collected before washing in the morning might be more suitable for detecting of large-scale specimens from patients infected with low SARS-CoV-2 load during infection late stage. Those results could facilitate other laboratories in collecting appropriate specimens for improving detection of SARS-CoV-2 from patients during infection late stage as well as initially screening.
Keywords: Collection timepoint; Positive detection rate; RT-PCR; SARS-Cov-2; Specimen types.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Exploring alternative swabs for use in SARS-CoV-2 detection from the oropharynx and anterior nares.J Virol Methods. 2020 Nov;285:113948. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113948. Epub 2020 Aug 9. J Virol Methods. 2020. PMID: 32783913 Free PMC article.
-
Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients.Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct;37:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673. Epub 2020 Apr 18. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32311437 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of simple nucleic acid extraction methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and saliva specimens during global shortage of extraction kits.J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104519. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104519. Epub 2020 Jun 23. J Clin Virol. 2020. PMID: 32629187 Free PMC article.
-
Upper respiratory tract sampling in COVID-19.Malays J Pathol. 2020 Apr;42(1):23-35. Malays J Pathol. 2020. PMID: 32342928 Review.
-
The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19.West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 13;21(3):470-472. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47370. West J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 32302278 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in the Nasopharynx at Time of First Infection Among Unvaccinated Individuals: A Secondary Cross-Protocol Analysis of 4 Randomized Trials.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412835. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12835. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38780941 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Human Saliva to Oropharyngeal Swabs, Nasopharyngeal Swabs, and Sputum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2023 Aug 10;2023:5807370. doi: 10.1155/2023/5807370. eCollection 2023. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37600753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An integrated dual-layer microfluidic platform for multiple respiratory viruses screening.Anal Chim Acta. 2023 Feb 15;1242:340812. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.340812. Epub 2023 Jan 7. Anal Chim Acta. 2023. PMID: 36657884 Free PMC article.
-
Morning SARS-CoV-2 Testing Yields Better Detection of Infection Due to Higher Viral Loads in Saliva and Nasal Swabs upon Waking.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0387322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03873-22. Epub 2022 Oct 26. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 36287073 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Four Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples from Tunja, Boyacá, Colombia.Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 10;7(9):240. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7090240. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 36136651 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ai J.-W., Zhang H.-C., Xu T. Optimizing diagnostic strategy for novel coronavirus pneumonia, a multi-center study in Eastern China. medRxiv. 2020
-
- Corman Victor M., Landt Olfert, Kaiser Marco. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro surveillance: bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin. 2020;25(3) doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.3.2000045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous