Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 3;21(17):6425.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21176425.

Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Nanovesicles Potentiate the Bone-Formation Efficacy of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2

Affiliations

Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Nanovesicles Potentiate the Bone-Formation Efficacy of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2

Songhyun Lim et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) is one of the most potent osteogenic factors used to treat bone loss. However, at higher doses, rhBMP-2 does not necessarily increase bone formation but rather increases the incidence of adverse side effects. Here, we investigated whether umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UCMSC)-derived nanovesicles (NVs) further increase the in vivo bone formation at high doses of rhBMP-2. In the presence of UCMSC-derived NVs, proliferation, migration, and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells were stimulated in vitro. Furthermore, migration and osteogenesis of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were stimulated. To examine the efficacy of UCMSC-derived NVs on in vivo bone formation, collagen sponges soaked with rhBMP-2 and UCMSC-derived NVs were used in athymic nude mice with calvarial defects. At a high rhBMP-2 dosage (500 ng/mL), UCMSC-derived NVs significantly promoted bone formation in calvarial defects; however, the UCMSC-derived NVs alone did not induce in vivo bone formation. Our results indicate that UCMSC-derived NVs can potentiate the bone formation efficacy of rhBMP-2 at a high dosage.

Keywords: angiogenesis; bone formation; osteogenesis; recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2; umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived nanovesicles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characterization of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UCMSC)-derived nanovesicles (NVs). (a) Schematic illustration of UCMSC-derived NV fabrication from UCMSCs. (b) TEM image of UCMSC-derived NVs. Scale bar, 50 nm. (c) Size distribution of UCMSC-derived NVs. (d) Representative plots and (e) quantification of UCMSC surface marker expression for UCMSCs and UCMSC-derived NVs analyzed by flow cytometry. Blue: cells, red: NVs. Data are presented as means; n = 3 per group. The Mann–Whitney test was used for statistical analysis. ns for not significant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UCMSC-derived NVs promote migration but not proliferation of human bone marrow-derived MSCs (hBMSCs) in vitro. (a) Migration and (b) proliferation of hBMSCs in the presence or absence of UCMSC-derived NVs at different concentrations of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2). (a) Scale bars, 100 µm. Veh indicates vehicle treatment. (a,b) Data are presented as means; n = 6 per group. Black: Veh, Red: NVs. The Mann–Whitney test was used for statistical analysis. * p < 0.05. ns for not significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
UCMSC-derived NVs promote osteogenesis of hBMSCs, but not MC3T3-E1 cells in the presence or absence of rhBMP-2 in vitro. (a) mRNA levels 11 days and (b) 21 days after, and (c) Alizarin red S staining 18 days after inducing osteogenesis of hBMSCs in the presence or absence of UCMSC-derived NVs at different concentrations of rhBMP-2. (d) mRNA levels 7 days after and (e) alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining 10 days after inducing osteogenesis of MC3T3-E1 cells in the presence or absence of UCMSC-derived NVs at different concentrations of rhBMP-2. (a,b,d) Black: Veh, Red: NVs. Data are presented as means; n = 4 per group. The Mann–Whitney test was used for statistical analysis. * p < 0.05. ns for not significant. (c,e) Scale bars, 50 µm. Veh indicates vehicle treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
UCMSC-derived NVs promote tube formation and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in the presence or absence of rhBMP-2 in vitro. (a) Migration, (b) tube formation, and (c) proliferation of HUVECs in the presence or absence of UCMSC-derived NVs at different concentrations of rhBMP-2. (a) Scale bars, 500 µm. n = 10 per group. (b) Scale bars, 100 µm. n = 12 per group. (c) n = 6 per group. (a,b) Veh indicates vehicle treatment. (ac) Black: Veh, Red: NVs. Data are presented as means. The Mann–Whitney test was used for statistical analysis. * p < 0.05. ns for not significant.
Figure 5
Figure 5
UCMSC-derived NVs promote bone formation in calvaria defects of mice at 6 weeks. (a) Image of collagen sponge with 4 mm diameter used for implantation. (b) The calvaria scanned by micro-CT. Veh indicates vehicle treatment. (c) Bone volume (BV), bone volume to tissue volume ratio (BV/TV) and trabecular number (Tb.N) evaluated with micro-CT. Black: Veh, Red: NVs. Data are presented as means; n = 8 for w/col-Veh-0. n = 9 for w/col-Veh-0.7. n = 10 for the other groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test was used for statistical analysis. * p < 0.05. ns for not significant. (d) Cross-sectional views of the calvaria defects stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Arrows indicate defect margin. Scale bars, 1 mm. (bd) w/o col: without collagen sponge, w/col: with collagen sponge.
Figure 6
Figure 6
UCMSC-derived NVs promote angiogenesis in calvaria defects of mice at 6 weeks. (a) Cross-sectional views of the calvaria defects stained with H&E. Veh indicates vehicle treatment. Arrows indicate vessel structures. Scale bars, 50 µm. (b) Quantification of vessel structures in the defects. Black: Veh, Red: NVs. Data are presented as means; n = 5 per group. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test was used for statistical analysis. * p < 0.05. (a,b) w/o col: without collagen sponge, w/col: with collagen sponge.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. d’Aquino R., De Rosa A., Lanza V., Tirino V., Laino L., Graziano A., Desiderio V., Laino G., Papaccio G. Human mandible bone defect repair by the grafting of dental pulp stem/progenitor cells and collagen sponge biocomplexes. Eur. Cell Mater. 2009;18:75–83. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v018a07. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geiger M. Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003;55:1613–1629. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim S.-S., Gwak S.-J., Kim B.-S. Orthotopic bone formation by implantation of apatite-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite particulates and bone morphogenetic protein-2. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2008;87:245–253. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31782. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koo K.H., Ahn J.M., Lee J.M., Kim B.-S., Kim C.-S., Im G.-I. Apatite-Coated Collagen Sponge for the Delivery of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Rabbit Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion. Artif. Organs. 2014;38:893–899. doi: 10.1111/aor.12249. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang H.S., La W.-G., Cho Y.-M., Shin W., Yeo G.-D., Kim B.-S. Comparison between heparin-conjugated fibrin and collagen sponge as bone morphogenetic protein-2 carriers for bone regeneration. Exp. Mol. Med. 2012;44:350–355. doi: 10.3858/emm.2012.44.5.039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances