A comparison of clinical, laboratory and chest CT findings of laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients at first admission
- PMID: 32876570
- PMCID: PMC8136532
- DOI: 10.5152/dir.2020.20270
A comparison of clinical, laboratory and chest CT findings of laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients at first admission
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to identify chest computed tomography (CT) characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), investigate the association between CT findings and laboratory or demographic findings, and compare the accuracy of chest CT with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
Methods: Overall, 120 of 159 consecutive cases isolated due to suspected COVID-19 at our hospital between 17 and 25 March 2020 were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR at first admission. The patients were divided into two groups: laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and clinically diagnosed COVID-19. Clinical findings, laboratory findings, radiologic features and CT severity index (CT-SI) of the patients were noted. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of chest CT were calculated for the diagnosis of COVID-19, using RT-PCR as reference.
Results: The laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 groups consisted of 69 (M/F 43/26, mean age 50.9±14.0 years) and 51 patients (M/F 24/27, mean age 50.9±18.8 years), respectively. Dry cough (62.3% vs. 52.9%), fever (30.4% vs. 25.5%) and dyspnea (23.2% vs. 27.5%) were the most common admission symptoms in the laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 groups, respectively. Bilateral multilobe involvement (83.1% vs. 57.5%), peripheral distribution (96.9% vs. 97.5%), patchy shape (75.4% vs. 70.0%), ground-glass opacities (GGO) (96.9% vs. 100.0%), vascular enlargement (56.9% vs. 50.0%), intralobular reticular density (40.0% vs. 40.0%) and bronchial wall thickening (27.7% vs. 45.0%) were the most common CT findings in the laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 subgroups, respectively. Except for the bilateral involvement and white blood cell (WBC) count, no difference was found between the clinical, laboratory, and parenchymal findings of the two groups. Positive correlation was found between CT-SI and, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values in the laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 subgroup. Chest CT and RT-PCR positivity rates among patients with suspected COVID-19 were 87.5% (105/120) and 57.5% (69/120), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy rates of chest CT were determined as 94.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.8-98.4), 21.57% (95% CI, 11.3-35.3), 61.90% (95% CI, 58.2-65.5), 73.3% (95% CI, 48.2-89.1) and 63.3% (95% CI, 54.1-71.9), respectively.
Conclusion: Chest CT has high sensitivity and low specificity in the diagnosis of COVID-19. The clinical, laboratory, and CT findings of laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients are similar.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Chest CT Features of COVID-19 in Rome, Italy.Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E79-E85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201237. Epub 2020 Apr 3. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32243238 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between Chest Computed Tomography and Lung Ultrasonography in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Nov;46(11):2918-2926. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 13. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020. PMID: 32771222 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal relationship between serial RT-PCR results and serial chest CT imaging, and serial CT changes in coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: a descriptive study of 155 cases in China.Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1175-1184. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07268-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32930834 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of the chest CT score in COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study.Virol J. 2021 Nov 18;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01699-6. Virol J. 2021. PMID: 34794467 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Literature Review on the Relative Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest CT Scans versus RT-PCR Testing for COVID-19 Diagnosis.Tomography. 2024 Jun 14;10(6):935-948. doi: 10.3390/tomography10060071. Tomography. 2024. PMID: 38921948 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Can a chest HRCT-based crash course on COVID-19 cases make inexperienced thoracic radiologists readily available to face the next pandemic?Clin Imaging. 2023 Feb;94:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Nov 22. Clin Imaging. 2023. PMID: 36434939 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Otolaryngological Symptoms of Laboratory-Confirmed and Clinically Diagnosed COVID-19 Patients.Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Sep 22;56(3):334-342. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2022.99399. eCollection 2022. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022. PMID: 36304218 Free PMC article.
-
[Korean Clinical Imaging Guidelines for Justification of Diagnostic Imaging Study for COVID-19].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022 Mar;83(2):265-283. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0117. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022. PMID: 36237918 Free PMC article. Review. Korean.
-
Diagnostic Performance of Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests, Chest Computed Tomography, and Lung Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for SARS-CoV-2 Compared with RT-PCR Testing: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 24;12(6):1302. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061302. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35741112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of clinical, radiological and laboratory findings in discharged and dead patients with COVID-19.Vacunas. 2022 Sep-Dec;23:S36-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.vacun.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 Jun 1. Vacunas. 2022. PMID: 35669082 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Turkish Ministry of Health. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION) GUIDE-Study of Scientific Board. Turkish Ministry of Health; Ankara, Turkey: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/
-
- World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report–51. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/2....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous