Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;40(2):189-198.
doi: 10.1007/s10669-020-09775-y. Epub 2020 May 24.

Recovery during a crisis: facing the challenges of risk assessment and resilience management of COVID-19

Affiliations

Recovery during a crisis: facing the challenges of risk assessment and resilience management of COVID-19

Scira Menoni et al. Environ Syst Decis. 2020.

Abstract

The paper offers a disaster risk management perspective to analyze the COVID-19 pandemic and to propose and assess non-pharmaceutical mitigation measures for the recovery phase. Three main aspects are tackled: (i) the need to take a scenario-based approach; (i) the need to propose more fine-tuned and context-sensitive mitigation measures, the effectiveness and the cost-benefit of which must be carefully appraised; (iii) better communication as a fundamental pillar of any mitigation measure. Evidence and ideas from the field of natural disasters and man-made technological incidents are applied to tackle the health risk posed by the SARS-COV 2 virus and its rapid spread according to a multi-disciplinary perspective that addresses the health-related challenges and the need to avoid societal and economic breakdown.

Keywords: Communication of risk and mitigation measures; Effectiveness of mitigation measures; Recovery from measures to mitigate infection spread; Resilience management in case of pandemic; Transfer crisis and resilience management concepts from natural hazards to pandemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Monitoring and data management as part of adaptive recovery management

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andrulis DP, Siddiqui NJ, Gantner JL. Preparing racially and ethnically diverse communities for public health emergencies. Health Aff. 2007;26(5):1269–1279. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1269. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beck U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1992.
    1. Benessia A, De Marchi B. When the earth shakes … and science with it. The management and communication of uncertainty in the L’Aquila earthquake. Futures. 2016;91:35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.011. - DOI
    1. Bretton R, Gottsmann J, Aspinall WP, Christie R. Implications of legal scrutiny processes (including the L’Aquila trial and other recent court cases) for future volcanic risk governance. J Appl Vulcanol. 2015;4(18):2–24.
    1. Brooks S, Webster R, Smith L, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, Gideon J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020;395:912–920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources