Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 28;8(2):143-149.
doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00002. Epub 2020 May 29.

Performance of Non-invasive Blood Parameters for Ruling Out Significant Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Affiliations

Performance of Non-invasive Blood Parameters for Ruling Out Significant Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Shivam Khare et al. J Clin Transl Hepatol. .

Abstract

Background and Aims: Evaluation of significant liver fibrosis is important for treatment decision and treatment response evaluation in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Since liver biopsy is invasive and transient elastography (TE) has limited availability, various non-invasive blood parameters need evaluation for their capabilities for detection of significant fibrosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, records of patients who had undergone liver biopsy for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B were evaluated to obtain various non-invasive blood parameters (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index [referred to as APRI], Fibrosis-4 score [referred to as FIB-4], gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio [referred to as GPR], and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-albumin ratio [referred to as GAR]), in addition to TE, to assess significant liver fibrosis and compare these to fibrosis stage in liver biopsy. Results: A total of 113 patients were included in the study (median age 33 [interquartile range: 11-82 years], 74% males). Most (75%) patients were HBeAg-negative. The liver biopsy revealed significant fibrosis (Ishak ≥3) in 13% of the patients and nil or mild fibrosis (Ishak <3) in 87% of the patients. TE findings were available for 85 patients, APRI and FIB-4 for 95 patients, GPR for 79 patients, and GAR for 78 patients. The median values of all the parameters were significantly higher in patients with significant fibrosis, as compared to patients with non-significant fibrosis, and all the blood parameters as well as TE were able to identify patients with significant fibrosis significantly well (p<0.05). All non-invasive parameters had low positive predictive value but negative predictive value above 92%. Compared to TE, all the non-invasive blood parameters had similar area under the curve for detecting significant fibrosis, with excellent negative predictive value (≥93%). Conclusions: Non-invasive blood parameters (APRI, FIB-4, GPR, and GAR) with negative predictive values above 93% are excellent parameters for ruling-out significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. These can be used at bedside in place of TE.

Keywords: APRI; Cirrhosis; FIB-4; GAR; GPR; Hepatitis B; Liver fibrosis; Transient elastography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interests related to this publication.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Receiver operating characteristic curve for TE for detecting significant fibrosis.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; TE, transient elastography.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Receiver operating characteristic curves for detecting significant fibrosis. (A) APRI, (B) FIB-4, (C) GPR, and (D) GAR.
Abbreviations: APRI, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index; FIB-4, Fibrosis-4; GAR, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-albumin ratio; GPR, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Background-epidemiology and natural history. In: WHO. guidelines on hepatitis B and C testing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442290/
    1. Arora A, Singh SP, Kumar A, Saraswat VA, Aggarwal R, Bangar M, et al. INASL position statements on prevention, diagnosis and management of hepatitis B virus infection in India: The Andaman Statements. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2018;8:58–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2017.12.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McMahon BJ. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. McMahon BJ1. Hepatology. 2009;49:S45–S55. doi: 10.1002/hep.22898. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bárcena Marugán R, García Garzón S. DNA-guided hepatitis B treatment, viral load is essential, but not sufficient. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:423–430. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.423. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar M, Sarin SK, Hissar S, Pande C, Sakhuja P, Sharma BC, et al. Virologic and histologic features of chronic hepatitis B virus-infected asymptomatic patients with persistently normal ALT. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1376–1384. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.075. - DOI - PubMed