Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 21:15:2633105520942221.
doi: 10.1177/2633105520942221. eCollection 2020.

DNA Methylation Clocks and Their Predictive Capacity for Aging Phenotypes and Healthspan

Tessa Bergsma  1   2 , Ekaterina Rogaeva  1   3
Affiliations
Review

DNA Methylation Clocks and Their Predictive Capacity for Aging Phenotypes and Healthspan

Tessa Bergsma et al. Neurosci Insights. .

Abstract

The number of age predictors based on DNA methylation (DNAm) profile is rising due to their potential in predicting healthspan and application in age-related illnesses, such as neurodegenerative diseases. The cumulative assessment of DNAm levels at age-related CpGs (DNAm clock) may reflect biological aging. Such DNAm clocks have been developed using various training models and could mirror different aspects of disease/aging mechanisms. Hence, evaluating several DNAm clocks together may be the most effective strategy in capturing the complexity of the aging process. However, various confounders may influence the outcome of these age predictors, including genetic and environmental factors, as well as technical differences in the selected DNAm arrays. These factors should be taken into consideration when interpreting DNAm clock predictions. In the current review, we discuss 15 reported DNAm clocks with consideration for their utility in investigating neurodegenerative diseases and suggest research directions towards developing a more optimal measure for biological aging.

Keywords: DNA methylation; age-related disease; biological age; chronological age; neurodegenerative disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparison of chronological vs biological DNAm clocks. Each DNAm clock is developed using a unique training model, including a variable number of CpGs, tissue source of DNA and corresponding age-related measures. While chronological DNAm clocks reflect age-related DNAm changes that are shared between individuals and are expected to reflect the intrinsic aging process, biological DNAm clocks reflect age-related DNAm changes that vary between individuals and are expected to capture associations with specific age-related phenotypes and external drivers that may influence age-related DNAm.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Gene-overlap among the 14 DNAm clocks. Matrix of pairwise intersections illustrating the relationship between different DNAm clocks based on the percentage of overlapping genes (biological DNAm clocks are indicated in red and chronological clocks in black). Each pairwise intersection, which matches 2 of the variables displayed on the horizontal and vertical axes, was calculated as the percentage of overlap between the genes of the different DNAm clocks and ranges from 0% to 100%. Colour depth indicates the strength of the relationship. Plot generated using the pairwise module of the Intervene Shiny App.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Belsky DW, Mof TE, Cohen AA, et al. Eleven telomere, epigenetic clock, and biomarker-composite quantifications of biological aging: do they measure the same thing? Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187:1220-1230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, Cohen HJ, Corcoran DL, Danese A. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E4104-E4110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker GT, Sprott RL. Biomarkers of aging. Exp Gerontol. 1988;23:223-239. - PubMed
    1. Warner HR. Current status of efforts to measure and modulate the biological rate of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:692-696. - PubMed
    1. Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:371-384. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources