Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;140(2):361-380.
doi: 10.1007/s00439-020-02210-x. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

Deciphering the complexity of simple chromosomal insertions by genome sequencing

Zirui Dong #  1   2   3 , Matthew Hoi Kin Chau #  1   2   3 , Yanyan Zhang #  1   2   3 , Peng Dai  4 , Xiaofan Zhu  1   2   3 , Tak Yeung Leung  1   2   5 , Xiangdong Kong  4 , Yvonne K Kwok  1 , Paweł Stankiewicz  6 , Sau Wai Cheung  7   8 , Kwong Wai Choy  9   10   11   12
Affiliations

Deciphering the complexity of simple chromosomal insertions by genome sequencing

Zirui Dong et al. Hum Genet. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Chromosomal insertions are thought to be rare structural rearrangements. The current understanding of the underlying mechanisms of their origin is still limited. In this study, we sequenced 16 cases with apparent simple insertions previously identified by karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis. Using mate-pair genome sequencing (GS), we identified all 16 insertions and revised previously designated karyotypes in 75.0% (12/16) of the cases. Additional cryptic rearrangements were identified in 68.8% of the cases (11/16). The incidence of additional cryptic rearrangements in chromosomal insertions was significantly higher compared to balanced translocations and inversions reported in other studies by GS. We characterized and classified the cryptic insertion rearrangements into four groups, which were not mutually exclusive: (1) insertion segments were fragmented and their subsegments rearranged and clustered at the insertion site (10/16, 62.5%); (2) one or more cryptic subsegments were not inserted into the insertion site (5/16, 31.3%); (3) segments of the acceptor chromosome were scattered and rejoined with the insertion segments (2/16, 12.5%); and (4) copy number gains were identified in the flanking regions of the insertion site (2/16, 12.5%). In addition to the observation of these chromothripsis- or chromoanasynthesis-like events, breakpoint sequence analysis revealed microhomology to be the predominant feature. However, no significant correlation was found between the number of cryptic rearrangements and the size of the insertion. Overall, our study provide molecular characterization of karyotypically apparent simple insertions, demonstrate previously underappreciated complexities, and evidence that chromosomal insertions are likely formed by nonhomologous end joining and/or microhomology-mediated replication-based DNA repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abel HJ, Larson DE, Regier AA, Chiang C, Das I, Kanchi KL, Layer RM, Neale BM, Salerno WJ, Reeves C, Buyske S, Genomics NCfCD, Matise TC, Muzny DM, Zody MC, Lander ES, Dutcher SK, Stitziel NO, Hall IM (2020) Mapping and characterization of structural variation in 17,795 human genomes. Nature 583:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2371-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ankala A, Kohn JN, Hegde A, Meka A, Ephrem CL, Askree SH, Bhide S, Hegde MR (2012) Aberrant firing of replication origins potentially explains intragenic nonrecurrent rearrangements within genes, including the human DMD gene. Genome Res 22:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.123463.111 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bacolla A, Wang G, Jain A, Chuzhanova NA, Cer RZ, Collins JR, Cooper DN, Bohr VA, Vasquez KM (2011) Non-B DNA-forming sequences and WRN deficiency independently increase the frequency of base substitution in human cells. J Biol Chem 286:10017–10026. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.176636 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bauters M, Van Esch H, Friez MJ, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Zenker M, Vianna-Morgante AM, Rosenberg C, Ignatius J, Raynaud M, Hollanders K, Govaerts K, Vandenreijt K, Niel F, Blanc P, Stevenson RE, Fryns JP, Marynen P, Schwartz CE, Froyen G (2008) Nonrecurrent MECP2 duplications mediated by genomic architecture-driven DNA breaks and break-induced replication repair. Genome Res 18:847–858. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.075903.107 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Cer RZ, Bruce KH, Donohue DE, Temiz NA, Mudunuri US, Yi M, Volfovsky N, Bacolla A, Luke BT, Collins JR, Stephens RM (2012) Searching for non-B DNA-forming motifs using nBMST (non-B DNA motif search tool). Curr Protoc Hum Genet 18(7):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg1807s73 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources