Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 29;11(1):322.
doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01839-9.

Efficacy of stem cell therapy for burn wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy of stem cell therapy for burn wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies

Yuan Li et al. Stem Cell Res Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Burns remain a serious public health problem with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Although there are various treatment options available, there is no consensus on the best treatment for severe burns as of yet. Stem cell therapy has a bright prospect in many preclinical studies of burn wounds. The systematic review was performed for these preclinical studies to assess the efficacy and possible mechanisms of stem cells in treating burn wounds.

Methods: Twenty-two studies with 595 animals were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 13 May 2020. In addition, a manual search of references of studies was performed to obtain potential studies. No language or time restrictions were enforced. RevMan 5.3 was used for all data analysis.

Results: The overall meta-analysis showed that stem cell therapy significantly improved burn healing rate (SMD 3.06, 95% CI 1.98 to 4.14), irrespective of transplant type, burn area, and treatment method in the control group. Subgroup analyses indicated that hair follicle stem cells seemed to exert more beneficial effects on animals with burn wounds (SMD 7.53, 95% CI 3.11 to 11.95) compared with other stem cells. Furthermore, stem cell therapy seemed to exert more beneficial effects on burn wounds with second-degree (SMD 7.53, 95% CI 3.11 to 11.95) compared with third-degree (SMD 2.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.00).

Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed that stem cell therapy exerts a healing function for burn wounds, mainly through angiogenesis and anti-inflammatory actions. These findings also demonstrate the need for considering variations in future clinical studies using stem cells to treat a burn wound in order to maximize the effectiveness. In general, stem cells can potentially become a novel therapy candidate for burn wounds.

Keywords: Burns; Meta-analysis; Preclinical study; Stem cell therapy; Wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the details of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The forest plot: the effects of stem cell therapy for increasing healing rate of burn wounds compared with controls
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The forest plot: the effects of stem cell therapy for a increasing blood vessel number and b increasing the level of VEGF on burn wounds compared with controls
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The forest plot: the effects of stem cell therapy for a reducing the level of IL-1 and b reducing the level of TNF-α of burn wounds compared with controls
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Funnel plot for a blood vessel density and b burn healing rate

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brusselaers N, Monstrey S, Vogelaers D, Hoste E, Blot S. Severe burn injury in Europe: a systematic review of the incidence, etiology, morbidity, and mortality. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang Q, Chen ZH, Wang SB, Chen XD. Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e013289. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the world. Part I: Distribution and risk factors. Burns. 2011;37(7):1087–1100. - PubMed
    1. Church D, Elsayed S, Reid O, Winston B, Lindsay R. Burn wound infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(2):403–434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rowan MP, Cancio LC, Elster EA, et al. Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements. Crit Care. 2015;19:243. - PMC - PubMed

Substances