Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0236564.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236564. eCollection 2020.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by direct RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal specimens without extraction of viral RNA

Affiliations

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by direct RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal specimens without extraction of viral RNA

Mohammad Rubayet Hasan et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

To circumvent the limited availability of RNA extraction reagents, we aimed to develop a protocol for direct RT-qPCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs without RNA extraction. Nasopharyngeal specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses collected in universal viral transport (UVT) medium were pre-processed by several commercial and laboratory-developed methods and tested by RT-qPCR assays without RNA extraction using different RT-qPCR master mixes. The results were compared to that of standard approach that involves RNA extraction. Incubation of specimens at 65°C for 10 minutes along with the use of TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix provides higher analytical sensitivity for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA than many other conditions tested. The optimized direct RT-qPCR approach demonstrated a limit of detection of 6.6x103 copy/ml and high reproducibility (co-efficient of variation = 1.2%). In 132 nasopharyngeal specimens submitted for SARS-CoV-2 testing, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of our optimized approach were 95%, 99% and 98.5%, respectively, with reference to the standard approach. Also, the RT-qPCR CT values obtained by the two methods were positively correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.6971, p = 0.0013). The rate of PCR inhibition by the direct approach was 8% compared to 9% by the standard approach. Our simple approach to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA by direct RT-qPCR may help laboratories continue testing for the virus despite reagent shortages or expand their testing capacity in resource limited settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Linearity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR by direct approach.
A tittered SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal specimen was serially diluted using a negative specimen, pre-heated at 65°C for 10 min and assessed by SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR as described in the Supplemental methods. A) Amplification curves from SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR assay on the serially diluted sample. B) RT-qPCR CT values were plotted against estimated copy number of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in each dilution. Each data point represents an average of data obtained from 8 replicates.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Correlation of RT = qPCR CT values obtained by direct versus standard approach.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, N Engl J Med 2019;382(8):727–733. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg 2020;76:71–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steffens I. A hundred days into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Eurosurveillance. https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.14.... Accessed 18 April 2020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 2020;25(3). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ranney ML, Griffeth V, Jha AK. Critical Supply Shortages—The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic. N Engl J Med 2020; 10.1056/NEJMp2006141 - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.