Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 16:6:9.
doi: 10.1186/s40959-020-00063-x. eCollection 2020.

Practical and cost-effective model to build and sustain a cardio-oncology program

Affiliations

Practical and cost-effective model to build and sustain a cardio-oncology program

Diego Sadler et al. Cardiooncology. .

Abstract

Background: Cardio-Oncology (CO) is a new subspecialty that thrives mostly in large academic quaternary centers. This study describes how to establish a successful cardio-oncology program, with limited resources, in order to effectively manage the unique care required by this patient population.

Methods: Clinical data was collected from 25 consecutive months. There were four foundational elements to establish a CO program: 1. Clinical program: integrating staff and resources from the Heart and Vascular, and Cancer Centers; 2. Education Program: establishing a platform to educate/advocate with respect to CO; 3. Engagement with professional societies: active engagement allowed for the successful establishment of the proposed CO program; and 4. Research program: establishing data collection modalities/cooperation with other institutions.

Results: 474 consecutive patients were treated by our CO program during the first 25 months of operation. Clinical data, information about cancer treatment, cardiovascular co morbidities, cardiac testing and impact of CO management are reported.

Conclusions: A successful CO program can be established utilizing existing resources without the need for significant additional assets. Integration with professional societies, advocacy, education and research, provide a platform for learning and growth. This model improves access to care and can be reproduced in a variety of settings.

Keywords: Cardio-oncology; Cardiology; Care delivery model; Oncology; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Central Illustration - “Key Components to Establishing a Successful CO Program”. This figure shows the integral components included in the build-out of this cost effective cardio-oncology program
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
“Cancer Subtype Distribution in CO Clinic”. This chart shows the relative proportion of cancer diagnoses among the patient population seen in the cardio-oncology clinic, over the course of 25 months. The most common diagnosis was breast cancer (45%)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. CDC, NCHS. Underlying Cause of Death 1999–2013 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released 2015. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 1999–2013, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. Accessed 3 Feb 2015.
    1. Herrmann J. From trends to transformation: where cardio-oncology is to make a difference. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3898–3900. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz781. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sturgeon KN, Deng L, Bluethman SL, et al. A population based study of cardiovascular disease mortality risk in US cancer patients. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3889–3897. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz766. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the “silver tsunami”. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:1029–1036. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources