Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 18:64.
doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4403. eCollection 2020.

The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 - structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews

Erik Kristoffer Arnesen  1 , Jacob Juel Christensen  1   2 , Rikke Andersen  3 , Hanna Eneroth  4 , Maijaliisa Erkkola  5 , Anne Høyer  6 , Eva Warensjö Lemming  4 , Helle Margrete Meltzer  7 , Þórhallur Ingi Halldórsson  8 , Inga Þórsdóttir  8 , Ursula Schwab  9 , Ellen Trolle  3 , Rune Blomhoff  1   6   10
Affiliations

The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 - structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews

Erik Kristoffer Arnesen et al. Food Nutr Res. .

Abstract

Background: Qualified systematic reviews (SRs) will form the main basis for evaluating causal effects of nutrients or food groups on health outcomes in the sixth edition of Nordic Nutrition Recommendations to be published in 2022 (NNR2022).

Objective: To describe rationale and structure of SRs used in NNR2022.

Design: The SR methodologies of the previous edition of NNR were used as a starting point. Methodologies of recent SRs commissioned by leading national food and health authorities or international food and health organizations were examined and scrutinized. Methodologies for developing SRs were agreed by the NNR2022 Committee in a consensus-driven process.

Results: Qualified SRs will be developed by a cross-disciplinary group of experts and reported according to the requirements of the EQUATOR network. A number of additional requirements must also be fulfilled, including 1) a clearly stated set of objectives and research questions with pre-defined eligibility criteria for the studies, 2) an explicit, reproducible methodology, 3) a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the eligibility criteria, 4) an assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies through an assessment of 'risk of bias' of the studies, 5) a systematic presentation and synthesis of the characteristics and findings of the included studies, and 6) a grading of the overall evidence. The complete definition and requirements of a qualified SR are described.

Discussion: Most SRs published in scientific journals do not fulfill all criteria of the qualified SRs in the NNR2022 project. This article discusses the structure and rationale for requirements of qualified SRs in NNR2022. National food and health authorities have only recently begun to use qualified SRs as a basis for nutrition recommendations.

Conclusion: Qualified SRs will be used to inform dietary reference values (DRVs) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) in the NNR2022 project.

Keywords: Baltics; Nordic countries; causal relationships; dietary reference values; evidence-based nutrition; food-based dietary guidelines; national food and health authorities; nutrient recommendations; systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening process. Partly adapted from EFSA (19) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (33).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. . The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – principles and methodologies. Food Nutr Res 2020. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4402 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. . The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – handbook for qualified systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2(8): e124 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein AH, Yetley EA, Lau J. Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition: nutritional research series, Vol 1 AHRQ Technical Reviews; Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Yetley EA, MacFarlane AJ, Greene-Finestone LS, Garza C, Ard JD, Atkinson SA, et al. . Options for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-/Canadian-sponsored working group. Am J Clin Nutr 2017; 105(1): 249S–85S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.139097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed