Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):1211.
doi: 10.3390/nano10061211.

Integrin-Targeting Dye-Doped PEG-Shell/Silica-Core Nanoparticles Mimicking the Proapoptotic Smac/DIABLO Protein

Affiliations

Integrin-Targeting Dye-Doped PEG-Shell/Silica-Core Nanoparticles Mimicking the Proapoptotic Smac/DIABLO Protein

Rossella De Marco et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Cancer cells demonstrate elevated expression levels of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), contributing to tumor cell survival, disease progression, chemo-resistance, and poor prognosis. Smac/DIABLO is a mitochondrial protein that promotes apoptosis by neutralizing members of the IAP family. Herein, we describe the preparation and in vitro validation of a synthetic mimic of Smac/DIABLO, based on fluorescent polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated silica-core nanoparticles (NPs) carrying a Smac/DIABLO-derived pro-apoptotic peptide and a tumor-homing integrin peptide ligand. At low μM concentration, the NPs showed significant toxicity towards A549, U373, and HeLa cancer cells and modest toxicity towards other integrin-expressing cells, correlated with integrin-mediated cell uptake and consequent highly increased levels of apoptotic activity, without perturbing cells not expressing the α5 integrin subunit.

Keywords: AVPI; IAP; RGD; Smac/DIABLO; cancer; cellular uptake; confocal microscopy; drug delivery; silica nanoparticles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Molecular components involved in the synthesis of nanoparticles (NPs)–N3 and functionalization scheme with the peptides H–Ala–Val–Pro–Ile (AVPI)–alkyne and/or cyclo Arg–Gly–Asp (cRGD)–alkyne for the preparation of AVPI–NPs, cRGD–NPs, and AVPI/cRGD–NPs. Morphological characterization of NPs–N3: (B) TEM images of NP–N3 (scale bar = 100 nm) and (C) TEM distribution of the diameters (nm). (D) Hydrodynamic diameters distribution by volume of NP–N3 determined by DLS (water, 25 °C). PEG, polyethylene glycol, PPO, polypropyleneoxide, RhB, rhodamine B, TEOS, tetraethyl orthosilicate, TMSCl, trimethylchlorosilane.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Cell viability of peptide–NPs as % of control cells. Bars represent the mean ± SD from two independent experiments (n = 2), each performed in triple. (B) Caspase-9 levels after 6 h of incubation with either 1 µM AVPI/cRGD–NPs or AVPI–NPs. Bars indicate the increase in activity of the treated cells compared to the control. Data are reported as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fluorescence microscopy of cells after 1 h of treatment with fluorescent peptide–RhB–NPs (red), counterstained with anti α-tubulin antibody (green) to visualize the cytoskeleton. (A) HT29 cells. Photographs were taken at 60× magnification, bar = 20 µm. (B) RhB-positive HT29 cells %, error bars represent SD (n = 15 imaging fields), *** p < 0.001. (C) HT29 cell viability % in the presence of AVPI–NPs; data represent mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05. (D) HeLa cells. Photographs were taken at 40× magnification. Bar 20 µm. (E) RhB-positive HeLa cells %, error bars represent SD (n = 15 imaging fields), *** p < 0.001. (F) HeLa cells were treated or not with an anti-CD49e antibody or control IgG for 1 h, then incubated whit fluorescent AVPI/cRGD–NPs (red) and counterstained with Hoechst33342 dye (blue) to visualize the nuclei. Photographs were taken at 40× magnification. (G) HeLa cells internalization %, error bars represent SD (n = 15 imaging fields), bar = 20 µm, *** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crook N.E., Clem R.J., Miller L.K. An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. J. Virol. 1993;67:2168–2174. doi: 10.1128/JVI.67.4.2168-2174.1993. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kocab A.J., Duckett C.S. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins as intracellular signalling intermediates. FEBS J. 2016;283:221–231. doi: 10.1111/febs.13554. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berthelet J., Dubrez L. Regulation of apoptosis by inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) Cells. 2013;2:163–187. doi: 10.3390/cells2010163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eckelman B.P., Drag M., Snipas S.J., Salvesen G.S. The mechanism of peptide-binding of IAP BIR domains. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:920. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deveraux Q.L., Takahashi R., Salvesen G.S., Reed J.C. X-linked IAP is a direct inhibitor of cell-death proteases. Nature. 1997;388:300–304. doi: 10.1038/40901. - DOI - PubMed