Implementation of patient-based real-time quality control
- PMID: 32486872
- DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1765731
Implementation of patient-based real-time quality control
Abstract
The quest to use patient results as quality control for routine clinical chemistry testing has long been driven by issues of the unavailability and cost of suitable quality control material and the matrix effects of synthetic material. Hematology laboratories were early adopters of average of normals techniques, primarily because of the difficulty in acquiring appropriate, stable quality control material, while in the chemistry laboratories, the perceived advantages and availability of synthetic material outweighed the disadvantages. However, the increasing volume of testing in clinical chemistry plus the capability of computer systems to deal with large and complex calculations has now made the use of patient-based quality control algorithms feasible. The desire to use patient-based quality control is also driven by increasing awareness that common quality control rules and frequency of analysis may fail to detect clinically significant assay biases. The non-commutability of quality control material has also become a problem as laboratories seek to harmonize results across regions and indeed globally. This review describes the history of patient-based quality control in clinical chemistry, summarizes the various approaches that can be implemented by laboratory professionals, and discusses how patient-based quality control can be integrated with traditional quality control techniques.
Keywords: Optimization; average of normal; moving average; quality control; simulation.
Similar articles
-
A primer on patient-based quality control techniques.Clin Biochem. 2019 Feb;64:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 11. Clin Biochem. 2019. PMID: 30550876 Review.
-
Reflective testing: adding value to laboratory testing.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Apr 28;50(7):1249-52. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2011-0611. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012. PMID: 22850057
-
Vitamin D testing: clinical and laboratory considerations.MLO Med Lab Obs. 2013 May;45(5):8, 10, 12-4; quiz 16. MLO Med Lab Obs. 2013. PMID: 23763042 No abstract available.
-
Failure to review STAT clinical laboratory requests and its economical impact.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016;26(1):61-7. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.005. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016. PMID: 26981019 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control: Review and Recommendations.Clin Chem. 2019 Aug;65(8):962-971. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.305482. Epub 2019 Jul 1. Clin Chem. 2019. PMID: 31263035 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of patient based real-time quality control on comparative assays for common clinical analytes.J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Sep;36(9):e24651. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24651. Epub 2022 Aug 10. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022. PMID: 35949026 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating moving average control procedures into the risk-based quality control plan in small-volume medical laboratories.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Jun 15;32(2):020711. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.020711. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022. PMID: 35799981 Free PMC article.
-
An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits.Ann Lab Med. 2022 Sep 1;42(5):597-601. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.5.597. Ann Lab Med. 2022. PMID: 35470278 Free PMC article.
-
Moving average procedures as an additional tool for real-time analytical quality control: challenges and opportunities of implementation in small-volume medical laboratories.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Feb 15;32(1):010705. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.010705. Epub 2021 Dec 15. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022. PMID: 34955673 Free PMC article.
-
Biological variation: Understanding why it is so important?Pract Lab Med. 2021 Jan 4;23:e00199. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00199. eCollection 2021 Jan. Pract Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 33490349 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical