Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Oct;67(10):e28217.
doi: 10.1002/pbc.28217. Epub 2020 May 26.

Parent recommendation to bank sperm among at-risk adolescent and young adult males with cancer

Affiliations
Observational Study

Parent recommendation to bank sperm among at-risk adolescent and young adult males with cancer

Jessica S Flynn et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) males newly diagnosed with cancer are often faced with making quick decisions about whether to cryopreserve ("bank") sperm prior to treatment initiation. Given that parental influence is crucial among young patients, the present study examines the prevalence of and factors associated with parent recommendation to bank sperm.

Procedure: Parents of 13- to 21-year-old males newly diagnosed with cancer and at risk for infertility secondary to impending gonadotoxic treatment completed questionnaires typically within one week of treatment initiation. Medical and sociodemographic data, communication factors, and psychological factors were considered in a logistic regression model of parent report of parental recommendation to bank sperm (yes/no).

Results: Surveys from 138 parents (70.3% female) of 117 AYA males (mean age = 16.1 years, SD = 2.0) were analyzed. Over half of parents recommended banking to their sons (N = 82; 59.4%). Parents who received a provider recommendation to bank sperm (odds ratio [OR] = 18.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.20-81.01, P < 0.001) or who believed in the benefits of banking (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 1.02-1.47, P = 0.03) were significantly more likely to recommend sperm banking.

Conclusions: Given parents' role in influencing sperm banking outcomes, provider recommendation and promotion of banking benefits may influence parents and empower initiation of these sensitive discussions with their sons. Utilization of this approach should yield beneficial outcomes regardless of the banking decision.

Keywords: behavioral studies; late effects of cancer treatment; pediatric oncology; psychology; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: No authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howlader NA, Krapcho M, Miller D, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2016 [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; Based on November 2018 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 16]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/.
    1. Hudson MM, Ness KK, Gurney JG, et al. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA. 2013;309(22):2371–2381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chemaitilly W, Cohen LE. Diagnosis of endocrine disease: endocrine late-effects of childhood cancer and its treatments. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(4):R183–R203. - PubMed
    1. Green DM, Liu W, Kutteh WH, et al. Cumulative alkylating agent exposure and semen parameters in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):1215–1223. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wasilewski-Masker K, Seidel KD, Leisenring W, et al. Male infertility in long-term survivors of pediatric cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(3):437–447. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms