Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229681.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229681. eCollection 2020.

The relationship between environmental sources and the susceptibility of Acanthamoeba keratitis in the United Kingdom

Affiliations

The relationship between environmental sources and the susceptibility of Acanthamoeba keratitis in the United Kingdom

Nicole A Carnt et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) patients have higher rates of Acanthamoeba and free-living amoeba (FLA) colonising domestic sinks than control contact lens (CL) wearers, and whether these isolates are genetically similar to the corneal isolates from their CL associated AK.

Methods: 129 AK patients from Moorefield Eye Hospital, London and 64 control CL wearers from the Institute of Optometry were included in this study. The participants self-collected home kitchen and bathroom samples from tap-spouts, overflows and drains using an instructional kit. The samples were cultured by inoculating onto a non-nutrient agar plate seeded with Escherichia coli, incubated at 32°C and examined for amoebae by microscopy for up to 2 weeks. Partial sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase genes (coxA) of Acanthamoeba isolates from four AK patients were compared to Acanthamoeba isolated from the patient's home. The association between sampling sites was analysed with the chi-square test.

Results: A total of 513 samples from AK patients and 189 from CL controls were collected. The yield of FLA was significantly greater in patients' bathrooms (72.1%) than CL controls' bathrooms (53.4%) (p<0.05). Spouts (kitchen 6.7%, bathroom 11%) had the lowest rate of Acanthamoeba isolation compared to drains (kitchen 18.2%, bathroom 27.9%) and overflow (kitchen 39.1%, bathroom 25.9%) either in kitchens or bathrooms (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the average prevalence of Acanthamoeba in all three sample sites in kitchens (16.9%) compared to all three sample sites in bathrooms (21.5%) and no association for Acanthamoeba prevalence between AK patients and CL controls. All four corneal isolates had the same coxA sequence as at least one domestic water isolate from the patients' sink of the kitchen and the bathroom.

Conclusion: The prevalence of Acanthamoeba and FLA was high in UK homes. FLA colonisation was higher in AK patients compared to controls but the prevalence of Acanthamoeba between AK patients and CL controls domestic sinks was similar. This study confirms that domestic water isolates are probably the source of AK infection. Advice about avoiding water contact when using CL's should be mandatory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SC is employed by Research Organisation (KC) Ltd. SK is employed by Ophtecs Corporation. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare. The commercial affiliation does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of samples analysed in current study.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Overall colonisation of Acanthamoeba and free-living amoeba (FLA) in samples from bathroom and kitchen in patients and control groups.
* denotes level of significance (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p≤ 0.0001).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Colonisation of Acanthamoeba in samples for spout, drain and overflow from bathroom and kitchen in patients and control groups.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Colonisation of free-living amoeba (FLA) in samples for spout, drain and overflow from bathroom and kitchen in patients and control groups.
* denotes level of significance (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p≤ 0.0001).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Cytochrome oxidase gene (coxA 1/2) sequence comparison of patient and environmental Acanthamoeba isolates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schuster FL, Visvesvara GS. Free-living amoebae as opportunistic and non-opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34(9):1001–27. Epub 2004/08/18. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.06.004 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan NA. Acanthamoeba: Biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006;30(4):564–95. Epub 2006/06/16. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00023.x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuster FL. Cultivation of pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amebas. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2002;15(3):342–54. 10.1128/CMR.15.3.342-354.2002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinna A, Porcu T, Boscia F, Cano A, Erre G, Mattana A. Free-Living Amoebae Keratitis. Cornea. 2017;36(7):785–90. Epub 2017/05/10. 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001226 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aitken D, Hay J, Kinnear FB, Kirkness CM, Lee WR, Seal DV. Amebic keratitis in a wearer of disposable contact lenses due to a mixed Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella infection. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(3):485–94. Epub 1996/03/01. 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30667-2 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types