Comparison of the compressive mechanical properties of auricular and costal cartilage from patients with microtia
- PMID: 32145904
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109688
Comparison of the compressive mechanical properties of auricular and costal cartilage from patients with microtia
Abstract
Children born with a small or absent ears undergo surgical reconstruction to restore their auricle. Currently, rib (costal) cartilage is used to carve the auricle. However as alternative, tissue engineered and synthetic materials are being developed to restore the auricle shape to overcome donor site morbidity and limited availability of rib cartilage. However, to date there is limited knowledge regarding the mechanical properties of the auricular and costal cartilage to optimise the required compressive properties of the graft. The remnant auricular and costal cartilage from 20 patients undergoing stage-1 microtia surgery was harvested. On the day of surgery, the cartilage was evaluated in compression, with each sample loaded to 300 g at 1 mm/s. RESULTS: The costal cartilage was observed to have a significantly higher Young's Elastic Modulus than auricular cartilage (average costal cartilage 11.43 MPa vs average auricular cartilage 2 MPa, p < 0.0001). The auricular cartilage showed a significantly higher relaxation rate than costal cartilage (average costal cartilage 0.72 MPa10-4 vs average auricular cartilage 1.93 MPa10-4, p < 0.05). The final absolute relaxation was significantly lower for elastic cartilage than costal cartilage (average costal cartilage 3.35 MPa vs average auricular cartilage 0.2 MPa, p < 0.0001). Alloplastic cartilage replacements used as alternatives for reconstruction were also evaluated. Silicone, Gore-Tex and Medpor were observed to have significantly higher Young's Elastic Modulus than costal and auricular cartilage. Costal cartilage has a higher Young's Elastic Modulus in compression compared to auricular cartilage. Current synthetic materials used to replace synthetic cartilage do not mimic costal cartilage, which should be addressed in the future.
Keywords: Auricular cartilage; Compression; Rib cartilage; Stress-strain curve; Young’s elastic modulus.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Different Methods of Fabricating Cartilaginous Ear Framework in Children With Microtia According to the Length of the Eighth Costal Cartilage Intraoperatively.J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jul;30(5):1425-1429. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005282. J Craniofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 31299736
-
Primary Ear Reconstruction Using Cadaveric Costal Cartilage.Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S547-S551. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003518. Epub 2023 Mar 17. Ann Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36975111
-
Costal Cartilage Assessment in Surgical Timing of Microtia Reconstruction.J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Sep;28(6):1521-1525. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003751. J Craniofac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28692518
-
An update on auricular reconstruction: three major auricular malformations of microtia, prominent ear and cryptotia.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Dec;18(6):544-9. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833fecb9. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010. PMID: 20856117 Review.
-
Microtia reconstruction: autologous rib and alloplast techniques.Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;22(4):623-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014. PMID: 25444733 Review.
Cited by
-
In vitro elastic cartilage reconstruction using human auricular perichondrial chondroprogenitor cell-derived micro 3D spheroids.J Tissue Eng. 2022 Dec 23;13:20417314221143484. doi: 10.1177/20417314221143484. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. J Tissue Eng. 2022. PMID: 36582939 Free PMC article.
-
Age and Gender Related Variability in the Strength of Auricular Cartilage in Living Humans.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Nov 18. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04481-5. Online ahead of print. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 39557640
-
Development and Characterization of Heparin-Containing Hydrogel/3D-Printed Scaffold Composites for Craniofacial Reconstruction.Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Aug;52(8):2287-2307. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03530-z. Epub 2024 May 11. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024. PMID: 38734845
-
Application of flexural and membrane stress analysis to distinguish tensile and compressive moduli of biologic materials.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jul;119:104474. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104474. Epub 2021 Mar 19. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021. PMID: 33887626 Free PMC article.
-
Fused Deposition Modeling PEEK Implants for Personalized Surgical Application: From Clinical Need to Biofabrication.Int J Bioprint. 2022 Sep 9;8(4):615. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i4.615. eCollection 2022. Int J Bioprint. 2022. PMID: 36404782 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical