Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 18;9(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s40169-020-00270-0.

Bone mineral density is negatively correlated with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Bone mineral density is negatively correlated with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tianyu Zhou et al. Clin Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: Newer epidemiological studies suggest that the incidence of ulcerative colitis might be increasing rapidly. Furthermore, osteoporosis in ulcerative colitis patients has gained great attention, but the epidemiologic evidence remains controversial. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to explore the association between bone density and ulcerative colitis.

Methods: Two investigators used PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases to identify all studies published before August 2019. Depending on the outcomes, investigators divided these studies into four groups (OR, SMD [BMD], SMD [z-score] and SMD [t-score]). To address the use of steroids, which is a major confounding factor in this analysis, another subgroup analysis of studies of steroid-free patients was conducted. Additionally, heterogeneity, sensitivity and stratified analyses were also performed.

Results: A total of 13 cross-sectional studies that involved 1154 participants were included in the present meta-analysis, and three of them were included in the steroid-free subgroup analysis. The pooled OR was 6.41 (95% CI 2.59-15.87) and the pooled SMD (BMD), SMD (t-score) and SMD (z-score) were - 0.24 (95% CI - 0.44 to - 0.04), - 0.55 (95% CI - 0.72 to - 0.37), and - 0.38 (95% CI - 0.56 and - 0.19), respectively. Since steroids are a significant confounder, the pooled SMD of the steroid-free subgroup was - 0.55 (- 0.85 to - 0.25), which revealed a strong negative relationship between bone density and ulcerative colitis in steroid-free patients. Additionally, other subgroup analyses also revealed a strong relationship.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides evidence for the potential association between ulcerative colitis and decreased bone density. It is essential for clinicians to consider bone mineral density in ulcerative colitis patients regardless of steroid-therapy.

Keywords: Bone mineral density; Inflammatory bowel disease; Meta-analysis; Ulcerative colitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram showing the selection of articles included in this meta-analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta-analyses of bone mineral density in ulcerative colitis patients. A Pooled odds ratio (OR) for the association between low bone mineral density and ulcerative colitis. The pooled OR was calculated using the random-effects model. B Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for bone mineral density in the participants. The pooled SMD was calculated using the random-effects model. C The SMD for the t-score in participants. The pooled SMD was calculated using the fixed-effects model. D The pooled SMD for the z-score in participants. The pooled SMD was calculated using the fixed-effects model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for bone mineral density and ulcerative colitis among steroid-free patients. The pooled SMD was calculated using the fixed-effects model
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Subgroup analyses of the association between bone mineral density and ulcerative colitis in the lumbar spine and the femoral neck. A Pooled odds ratio (OR) for the association between low bone mineral density and ulcerative colitis in the lumbar spine and the femoral neck. Three studies did not include the outcomes based on the detection sites separately, so they were excluded from this subgroup analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity in these two subgroups (I2 = 21.3%, P = 0.281 and I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.624). B Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for bone mineral density and ulcerative colitis in the lumbar spine and femoral neck. C Pooled SMDs for the association between t-score and ulcerative colitis in the lumbar spine and femoral neck. One study did not include the outcomes based on the detection sites separately, so it was excluded from this subgroup analysis. D Pooled SMDs for the association between the z-score and ulcerative colitis in the lumbar spine and femoral neck

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet. 2017;390:2769–2778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ng SC. Emerging leadership lecture: Inflammatory bowel disease in Asia: emergence of a “Western” disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:440–445. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12859. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peck WA. Consensus development conference diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1993;94:646–650. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90218-E. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, et al. BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long term results from the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1947–1954. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393:364–376. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources