Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):216.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8235-6.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices assessment of malaria interventions in rural Zambia

Affiliations

Knowledge, attitudes and practices assessment of malaria interventions in rural Zambia

Desmond T Jumbam et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Despite rapid upscale of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), malaria remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in Zambia. Uptake and utilization of these and novel interventions are often affected by knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) amongst persons living in malaria-endemic areas. The aims of this study were to assess malaria KAP of primary caregivers and explore trends in relation to ITN use, IRS acceptance and mosquito density in two endemic communities in Luangwa and Nyimba districts, Zambia.

Methods: A cohort of 75 primary caregivers were assessed using a cross-sectional, forced-choice malaria KAP survey on ITN use, IRS acceptance and initial perception of a novel spatial repellent (SR) product under investigation. Entomological sampling was performed in participant homes using CDC Miniature Light Traps to relate indoor mosquito density with participant responses.

Results: Ninety-nine percent of participants cited bites of infected mosquitoes as the route of malaria transmission although other routes were also reported including drinking dirty water (64%) and eating contaminated food (63%). All caregivers agreed that malaria was a life-threatening disease with the majority of caregivers having received malaria information from health centers (86%) and community health workers (51%). Cumulatively, self-reported mosquito net use was 67%. Respondents reportedly liked the SR prototype product but improvements on color, shape and size were suggested. Overall, 398 mosquitoes were captured from light-trap collections, including 49 anophelines and 349 culicines. Insecticide treated nets use was higher in households from which at least one mosquito was captured.

Conclusions: The current study identified misconceptions in malaria transmission among primary caregivers indicating remaining knowledge gaps in educational campaigns. Participant responses also indicated a misalignment between a low perception of IRS efficacy and high stated acceptance of IRS, which should be further examined to better understand uptake and sustainability of other vector control strategies. While ITNs were found to be used in study households, misperceptions between presence of mosquitoes and bite protection practices did exist. This study highlights the importance of knowledge attitudes and practice surveys, with integration of entomological sampling, to better guide malaria vector control product development, strategy acceptance and compliance within endemic communities.

Keywords: And practices (KAP); Attitudes; IRS; ITN; Knowledge; Malaria; Spatial repellents; Zambia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Terrain and locations of Luangwa and Nyimba Districts in Zambia. This map was created by the authors
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of Luangwa and Nyimba districts in Zambia and locations of surveyed households within each district. This map was created by the authors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of ITN use by source of malaria information
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Caregiver responses related to malaria transmission route in Nyimba and Luangwa districts study districts, Zambia
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Caregiver stated attitudes towards malaria disease and interventions

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO | World malaria report 2018 [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2018 Nov 25]. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2018/en/
    1. WHO | World Malaria Report 2015 [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2016 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2015/report...
    1. Ministry of Health . Zambia National Malaria Indicator Survey 2015. 2015.
    1. Durnez L, Coosemans M. Residual Transmission of Malaria: An Old Issue for New Approaches. In: Manguin S, editor. Anopheles Mosquitoes - New Insights Malar Vectors [Internet]. InTech; 2013 [cited 2016 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/anopheles-mosquitoes-new-insights-into-m...
    1. Killeen GF. Characterizing, controlling and eliminating residual malaria transmission. Malar J. 2014;13:330. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-330. - DOI - PMC - PubMed