Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1367-1376.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1008.

Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

J Peter Donnelly  1 Sharon C Chen  2 Carol A Kauffman  3 William J Steinbach  4 John W Baddley  5 Paul E Verweij  6 Cornelius J Clancy  7 John R Wingard  8 Shawn R Lockhart  9 Andreas H Groll  10 Tania C Sorrell  11 Matteo Bassetti  12 Hamdi Akan  13 Barbara D Alexander  14 David Andes  15 Elie Azoulay  16 Ralf Bialek  17 Robert W Bradsher  18 Stephane Bretagne  19 Thierry Calandra  20 Angela M Caliendo  21 Elio Castagnola  22 Mario Cruciani  23 Manuel Cuenca-Estrella  24 Catherine F Decker  25 Sujal R Desai  26 Brian Fisher  27 Thomas Harrison  28 Claus Peter Heussel  29 Henrik E Jensen  30 Christopher C Kibbler  31 Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis  32 Bart-Jan Kullberg  33 Katrien Lagrou  34 Frédéric Lamoth  35 Thomas Lehrnbecher  36 Jurgen Loeffler  37 Olivier Lortholary  38 Johan Maertens  39   40 Oscar Marchetti  20 Kieren A Marr  41 Henry Masur  42 Jacques F Meis  43 C Orla Morrisey  44 Marcio Nucci  45 Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner  46 Livio Pagano  47 Thomas F Patterson  48 John R Perfect  14 Zdenek Racil  49 Emmanuel Roilides  50 Marcus Ruhnke  51 Cornelia Schaefer Prokop  52 Shmuel Shoham  41 Monica A Slavin  53 David A Stevens  54   55 George R Thompson  56 Jose A Vazquez  57 Claudio Viscoli  58 Thomas J Walsh  59 Adilia Warris  60 L Joseph Wheat  61 P Lewis White  62 Theoklis E Zaoutis  63 Peter G Pappas  5
Affiliations

Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

J Peter Donnelly et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential.

Methods: To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved.

Results: There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses.

Conclusions: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.

Keywords: consensus; definitions; diagnosis; invasive fungal diseases; research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. ; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group Consensus Group Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:1813–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maertens JA, Raad II, Marr KA, et al. . Isavuconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive mould disease caused by Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi (SECURE): a phase 3, randomised-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2016; 387:760–9. - PubMed
    1. Herbrecht R, Patterson TF, Slavin MA, et al. . Application of the 2008 definitions for invasive fungal diseases to the trial comparing voriconazole versus amphotericin B for therapy of invasive aspergillosis: a collaborative study of the Mycoses Study Group (MSG 05) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Infectious Diseases Group. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:713–20. - PubMed
    1. Pappas PG, Alexander BD, Andes DR, et al. . Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:1101–11. - PubMed
    1. Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Park BJ, et al. . Prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2001–2006: overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) database. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:1091–100. - PubMed

Substances