Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;39(5):977-985.
doi: 10.1002/jum.15183. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

Characterization of Adnexal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Characterization of Adnexal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging: A Pilot Study

Lauren J Delaney et al. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objectives: This pilot study evaluated whether contrast-enhanced subharmonic imaging (SHI) could be used to characterize adnexal masses before surgical intervention.

Methods: Ten women (with 12 lesions) scheduled for surgery of an ovarian mass underwent an SHI examination of their adnexal region using a modified LOGIQ E9 scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with an endocavitary transducer, in which digital clips were acquired by pulse destruction-replenishment SHI across the lesions. Time-intensity curves were created offline to quantitatively evaluate SHI parameters (fractional tumor perfusion, peak contrast intensity, time to peak contrast enhancement, and area under the time-intensity curve), which were compared to pathologic characterizations of the lesions.

Results: Of the 12 masses, 8 were benign, and 4 were malignant. A qualitative analysis of the SHI images by an experienced radiologist resulted in diagnostic accuracy of 70%, compared to 56% without contrast, whereas an inexperienced radiologist improved from 50% to 58% accuracy, demonstrating the benefit of SHI. A quantitative analysis of SHI parameters produced diagnostic accuracy as high as 81%. Peak contrast intensity was significantly greater in malignant than benign masses (mean ± SD, 0.109 ± 0.088 versus 0.046 ± 0.030 arbitrary units; P = .046). Malignant masses also showed significantly greater perfusion than benign masses (24.79% ± 25.34% versus 7.62% ± 6.50%; P = .045). When the radiologist reads were combined with the most predictive quantitative SHI parameter (percent perfusion), diagnostic accuracy improved to 84% for the experienced radiologist and 96% for the novice radiologist.

Conclusions: Results indicate that SHI for presurgical characterization of adnexal masses may improve the determination of malignancy and diagnostic accuracy, albeit based on a small sample size.

Keywords: adnexal masses; contrast agents; diagnostics; subharmonic imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Representative SHI images from study patients. A, Precontrast image of a lesion later classified as malignant by pathologic evaluation. B, Precontrast image of a lesion later classified as benign by pathologic evaluation. C, Subharmonic image of the malignant lesion shown in A. D, Subharmonic image of the benign lesion shown in B.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Representative TICs from study patients. A, Initial wash-in of contrast within a lesion later classified as malignant by pathologic evaluation. B, Initial wash-in of contrast within a lesion later classified as benign by pathologic evaluation. C, Representative flash-replenishment sequence from the malignant lesion shown in A. D, Representative flash-replenishment sequence from the benign lesion shown in B. Note that the y-axis values are scaled to the data in each curve for better visualization. ROI indicates region of interest.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnostic confidence for both novice (R_nov) and experienced (R_exp) radiologists before (BL for baseline) and after contrast-enhanced SHI.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnostic data. A, Analysis of the experienced radiologist (R_exp), novice radiologist (R_nov), and highest quantitative SHI parameter (PER). B, Combination of PER with radiologist reads.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013:120–163.
    1. Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE, et al. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:284–296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell DG, Javitt MC, Glanc P, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria staging and follow-up of ovarian cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10:822–827. - PubMed
    1. Jinawath N, Shih IM. Biology and pathology of ovarian cancer In: Briston R, Armstrong D (eds). Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer Series: Ovarian Cancer. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 2011:17–32.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:7–30. - PubMed