Screening Guidelines Update for Average-Risk and High-Risk Women
- PMID: 31714845
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22205
Screening Guidelines Update for Average-Risk and High-Risk Women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to describe screening updates for women with average and high risk for breast cancer, compare different screening strategies, and describe new approaches in risk prediction, including radiomics. CONCLUSION. All women are at substantial risk for breast cancer. For women with average risk, annual mammography beginning at 40 years old maximizes the life-extending benefits and provides improved treatment options. Women at higher risk need earlier and more intense screening. Delaying initiation or decreasing frequency of mammographic screening adversely affects breast cancer detection.
Keywords: average-risk women; breast cancer screening; guidelines; high-risk women; screening mammography.
Similar articles
-
Screening Mammography in Women 40-49 Years Old: Current Evidence.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):264-270. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18707. Epub 2017 Oct 24. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018. PMID: 29064760 Review.
-
Screening Mammography for Average-Risk Women: The Controversy and NCCN's Position.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Nov;16(11):1398-1404. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7081. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018. PMID: 30442738 Review.
-
Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.Physician Assist. 1994 Oct;18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. Physician Assist. 1994. PMID: 10138304 Review.
-
How the USPSTF's Mammographic Screening Guidelines Should Be Interpreted.Am J Med. 2017 Jul;130(7):769-770. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 24. Am J Med. 2017. PMID: 28344145 No abstract available.
-
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5609. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID: 21257850
Cited by
-
Reducing False-Positive Biopsies using Deep Neural Networks that Utilize both Local and Global Image Context of Screening Mammograms.J Digit Imaging. 2021 Dec;34(6):1414-1423. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00530-6. Epub 2021 Nov 3. J Digit Imaging. 2021. PMID: 34731338 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning for predicting future lesion emergence in high-risk breast MRI screening: a feasibility study.Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Jun 7;7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00343-y. Eur Radiol Exp. 2023. PMID: 37280478 Free PMC article.
-
Screening Programs for Breast Cancer: Toward Individualized, Risk-Adapted Strategies of Early Detection.Cancer Treat Res. 2023;188:63-88. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_3. Cancer Treat Res. 2023. PMID: 38175342
-
Determinants of Breast Cancer Screening Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Cohort at Increased Inherited Cancer Risk in the United States.Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241272727. doi: 10.1177/10732748241272727. Cancer Control. 2024. PMID: 39420801 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of aging and gadolinium exposure on T1, T2, and T2*-relaxation in healthy women with an increased risk of breast cancer with and without prior exposure to gadoterate meglumine at 3.0-T brain MR imaging.Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):331-345. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08069-4. Epub 2021 Jul 3. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34218287 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
