GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions
- PMID: 31711912
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014
GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions
Abstract
Objectives: Clear communication of systematic review findings will help readers and decision makers. We built on previous work to develop an approach that improves the clarity of statements to convey findings and that draws on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
Study design and setting: We conducted workshops including 80 attendants and a survey of 110 producers and users of systematic reviews. We calculated acceptability of statements and revised the wording of those that were unacceptable to ≥40% of participants.
Results: Most participants agreed statements should be based on size of effect and certainty of evidence. Statements for low, moderate and high certainty evidence were acceptable to >60%. Key guidance, for example, includes statements for high, moderate and low certainty for a large effect on intervention x as: x results in a large reduction…; x likely results in a large reduction…; x may result in a large reduction…, respectively.
Conclusions: Producers and users of systematic reviews found statements to communicate findings combining size and certainty of an effect acceptable. This article provides GRADE guidance and a wording template to formulate statements in systematic reviews and other decision tools.
Keywords: Evidence-based Medicine; Health communication; Language; Persuasive communication; Review literature as topic; Surveys and Questionnaires.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7ebbf. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24026148
-
GRADE good practice statements: a time to say "good-bye"? A new typology for normative statements on interventions.J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;171:111371. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111371. Epub 2024 Apr 25. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38677562
-
GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 32980429 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;98:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 13. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29452221 Review.
-
Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 33476768 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Meal Timing and Anthropometric and Metabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2442163. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42163. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39485353 Free PMC article.
-
Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06195-3. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39478552 Free PMC article.
-
High-flow nasal cannula in adults with chronic respiratory diseases during physical exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Oct 22;11(1):e002431. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002431. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024. PMID: 39438081 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of cancer development associated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 18;13(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02677-z. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39425150 Free PMC article.
-
Cannabis Use During Adolescence and Young Adulthood and Academic Achievement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Oct 7:e243674. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3674. Online ahead of print. JAMA Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39374005
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources