Psychosocial and obstetric determinants of women signalling distress during Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) screening in Sydney, Australia
- PMID: 31699040
- PMCID: PMC6836342
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2565-3
Psychosocial and obstetric determinants of women signalling distress during Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) screening in Sydney, Australia
Abstract
Background and objectives: The perinatal period presents a high-risk time for development of mood disorders. Australia-wide universal perinatal care, including depression screening, make this stage amenable to population-level preventative approaches. In a large cohort of women receiving public perinatal care in Sydney, Australia, we examined: (1) the psychosocial and obstetric determinants of women who signal distress on EPDS screening (scoring 10-12) compared with women with probable depression (scoring 13 or more on EPDS screening); and (2) the predictive ability of identifying women experiencing distress during pregnancy in classifying women at higher risk of probable postnatal depression.
Methods: We analysed routinely collected perinatal data from all live-births within public health facilities from two health districts in Sydney, Australia (N = 53,032). Perinatal distress was measured using the EPDS (scores of 10-12) and probable perinatal depression was measured using the EPDS (scores of 13 or more). Logistic regression models that adjusted for confounding variables were used to investigate a range of psychosocial and obstetric determinants and perinatal distress and depression.
Results: Eight percent of this cohort experienced antenatal distress and about 5 % experienced postnatal distress. Approximately 6 % experienced probable antenatal depression and 3 % experienced probable postnatal depression. Being from a culturally and linguistically diverse background (AOR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.8-2.3, P < 0.001), a lack of partner support (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI 2.3-3.7) and a maternal history of childhood abuse (AOR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3) were associated with antenatal distress. These associations were similar in women with probable antenatal depression. Women who scored 10 to12 on antenatal EPDS assessment had a 4.5 times higher odds (95% CI 3.4-5.9, P < 0.001) of experiencing probable postnatal depression compared with women scoring 9 or less.
Conclusion: Antenatal distress is more common than antenatal depressive symptoms and postnatal distress or depression. Antenatal maternal distress was associated with probable postnatal depression. Scale properties of the EPDS allows risk-stratification of women in the antenatal period, and earlier intervention with preventively focused programs. Prevention of postnatal depression could address a growing burden of illness and long-term complications for mothers and their infants.
Keywords: Depression; Determinants; Distress; EPDS; Perinatal; Pregnancy; Prevention; Psychosocial; Screening.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Perinatal Distress and Depression in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Australian Women: The Role of Psychosocial and Obstetric Factors.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;16(16):2945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162945. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31426304 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of antenatal depression and postnatal depression in Australia.BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1598-x. BMC Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29463221 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Antenatal Depression on Perinatal Outcomes in Australian Women.PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169907. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28095461 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale to screen for anxiety disorders: conceptual and methodological considerations.J Affect Disord. 2013 Apr 5;146(2):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Oct 30. J Affect Disord. 2013. PMID: 23116811 Review.
-
Predictive validity of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale and other tools for screening depression in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 May;307(5):1331-1345. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06525-0. Epub 2022 Apr 13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 35416478 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of COVID-19 Related Distress on Antenatal Depression in Australia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064783. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36981691 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial stratification of antenatal indicators to guide population-based programs in perinatal depression.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 6;21(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03722-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33823838 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of community nursing based on the Roy adaptation model on postpartum depression and sleep quality of parturients.Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):8278-8285. eCollection 2021. Am J Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 34377317 Free PMC article.
-
Childhood abuse and perinatal outcomes for mother and child: A systematic review of the literature.PLoS One. 2024 May 24;19(5):e0302354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302354. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38787894 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal Antibiotic Exposure and the Risk of Developing Antenatal or Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: The Maternal Experience Study Protocol.Methods Protoc. 2023 Oct 11;6(5):98. doi: 10.3390/mps6050098. Methods Protoc. 2023. PMID: 37888030 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26(4):289–295. - PubMed
-
- O'Hara MW, Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum depression-a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry. 1996;8(1):37–54.
-
- Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical