Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 1;148(suppl_2):1406S-1412S.
doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy134.

Challenges in Developing Analytically Validated Laboratory-Derived Dietary Supplement Databases

Affiliations

Challenges in Developing Analytically Validated Laboratory-Derived Dietary Supplement Databases

Joseph M Betz et al. J Nutr. .

Abstract

The Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD) is sponsored by the Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) and the National Library of Medicine (NLM). It provides a searchable, free database of the contents of ∼65,000 supplement labels. A companion database of analytically verified product labels [the Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database (DSID)] was created by ODS, NLM, and the USDA. There are considerable challenges to populating both databases, but the DSID faces unique analytic chemistry challenges. This article describes the challenges to creating analytically verified marketplace surveys of dietary supplement (DS) product content claims for inclusion in public databases. Nutritionists and public health scientists require information on actual exposures to DS constituents because labeled content may not match labeled product content. Analytic verification of composition of DSs provides a link to actual exposure. A public database of analytically derived DS content was developed to provide more accurate estimates of dietary intake in population-based epidemiologic studies. The DSID has conducted surveys of several types of vitamin- and mineral-containing DSs. Results showing label content claims as analytically derived values are available in the current DSID. A recent pilot project explored the feasibility of adding botanical DS products to the DSID. Candidates for future botanical DSID studies will be based on sales volume, potential public health impacts, and the availability of validated analytic methods and reference materials. Databases like DSID and the DSLD are essential for researchers and clinicians to evaluate dietary ingredient intakes in population-based epidemiologic studies. Together, these databases provide a picture of the DS marketplace. The DSID provides an analytic survey of marketed DSs. However, selection of future botanical supplements for DSID evaluation involves analytic challenges. Even when appropriate resources are available, method selection and data evaluation are resource- and time-consuming.

Keywords: certified reference material; dietary supplement; ingredient database; label; laboratory analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United States Public Law 103-417, 103rd Congress (October 25, 1994), Dietary Supplement and Health Education Act of 1994. Available from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-108/pdf/STATUTE-108-Pg4325.pdf.
    1. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21-Food and Drugs, Chapter I-Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Subchapter B-Food for Human Consumption, Part 101-Food Labeling. [Internet]. [cited 2018 Apr 17]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?f....
    1. Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels Report of the Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 1997.
    1. Fenyvesi C. Herbal tonic. US News World Rep 1998;Jan 19:70.
    1. Greenwald J. Herbal healing. Time 1998;Nov 23:152.

Publication types