RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- PMID: 31462531
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the MRC and Wellcome Trust for the submitted work; JACS reports grants from the MRC and NIHR during the conduct of the study; JS reports grants from the MRC, Cochrane Collaboration, and NIHR during the conduct of the study; CJC is one of the coordinating editors of Cochrane Airways and has responsibility for training Cochrane authors in the UK in Cochrane methodology (including the assessment of risks of bias); JRE reports grants from the MRC and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work; MAH reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study; PJ serves as an unpaid member of the steering group of cardiovascular trials funded by Astra Zeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors, St Jude Medical, and The Medicines Company, has received research grants to the institution from Astra Zeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors International, Eli Lilly, and The Medicines Company, and honorariums to the institution for participation in advisory boards from Amgen, but has not received personal payments by any pharmaceutical company or device manufacturer; JJK reports personal fees from BMJ outside the submitted work; TLa is an employee of Cochrane; TLi reports grants from the NIH National Eye Institute, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute during the conduct of the study; AM reports grants from MRC and Cancer Research UK during the conduct of the study; KT reports grants from MRC during the conduct of the study and personal fees from CHDI outside the submitted work; JPTH reports grants from the MRC and Cochrane Collaboration during the conduct of the study; the authors declare no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Comment on
-
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 22008217 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0804-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 31382898 Free PMC article.
-
Practicalities of using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised and non-randomised study designs applied in a health technology assessment setting.Res Synth Methods. 2014 Sep;5(3):200-11. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1102. Epub 2013 Nov 14. Res Synth Methods. 2014. PMID: 26052846
-
Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32247026
-
The risk of bias of animal experiments in implant dentistry: a methodological study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e39-e45. doi: 10.1111/clr.12852. Epub 2016 Apr 16. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017. PMID: 27083336 Review.
-
The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years.J Pediatr. 2018 Feb;193:237-244.e37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Nov 21. J Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29169611 Review.
Cited by
-
Intramedullary nail fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 4;19(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05158-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39497147
-
Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Obes Surg. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07564-z. Online ahead of print. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 39496986 Review.
-
Mental health interventions affecting university faculty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 2;24(1):3040. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20402-2. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39488684 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of the injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in gingival phenotype modification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):1331. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05109-5. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39487452 Free PMC article.
-
Augmentation of cognitive-behavioural therapy for obsessive-compulsive and anxiety disorders: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e090431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090431. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39486819 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- MC_UU_12023/21/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/K025635/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- UG1 EY020522/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- MR/L004933/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/J004855/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- G0701659/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- DRF-2011-04-016/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_00011/3/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/M025209/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/S001751/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/K025643/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/L004933/2/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources