Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 1:10:21.
doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_27_19. eCollection 2019.

The Landscape of Digital Pathology in Transplantation: From the Beginning to the Virtual E-Slide

Ilaria Girolami  1 , Anil Parwani  2 , Valeria Barresi  1 , Stefano Marletta  1 , Serena Ammendola  1 , Lavinia Stefanizzi  1 , Luca Novelli  3 , Arrigo Capitanio  4 , Matteo Brunelli  1 , Liron Pantanowitz  5 , Albino Eccher  1
Affiliations
Review

The Landscape of Digital Pathology in Transplantation: From the Beginning to the Virtual E-Slide

Ilaria Girolami et al. J Pathol Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Digital pathology has progressed over the last two decades, with many clinical and nonclinical applications. Transplantation pathology is a highly specialized field in which the majority of practicing pathologists do not have sufficient expertise to handle critical needs. In this context, digital pathology has proven to be useful as it allows for timely access to expert second-opinion teleconsultation. The aim of this study was to review the experience of the application of digital pathology to the field of transplantation.

Methods: Papers on this topic were retrieved using PubMed as a search engine. Inclusion criteria were the presence of transplantation setting and the use of any type of digital image with or without the use of image analysis tools; the search was restricted to English language papers published in the 25 years until December 31, 2018.

Results: Literature regarding digital transplant pathology is mostly about the digital interpretation of posttransplant biopsies (75 vs. 19), with 15/75 (20%) articles focusing on agreement/reproducibility. Several papers concentrated on the correlation between biopsy features assessed by digital image analysis (DIA) and clinical outcome (45/75, 60%). Whole-slide imaging (WSI) only appeared in recent publications, starting from 2011 (13/75, 17.3%). Papers dealing with preimplantation biopsy are less numerous, the majority (13/19, 68.4%) of which focus on diagnostic agreement between digital microscopy and light microscopy (LM), with WSI technology being used in only a small quota of papers (4/19, 21.1%).

Conclusions: Overall, published studies show good concordance between digital microscopy and LM modalities for diagnosis. DIA has the potential to increase diagnostic reproducibility and facilitate the identification and quantification of histological parameters. Thus, with advancing technology such as faster scanning times, better image resolution, and novel image algorithms, it is likely that WSI will eventually replace LM.

Keywords: Digital pathology; donor biopsy; graft biopsy; image analysis; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of publications over time and according to the type of digital pathology. WSI: Whole-slide imaging, NOS: Not otherwise specified
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hierarchy of papers according to transplantation phase, mode of digital pathology, and main topic of study. *A paper is counted in both groups as it comprises both pre- and post-transplant biopsies. IHC: Immunohistochemistry, WSI: Whole-slide imaging
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Goacher E, Randell R, Williams B, Treanor D. The diagnostic concordance of whole slide imaging and light microscopy: A systematic review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141:151–61. - PubMed
    1. Williams BJ, DaCosta P, Goacher E, Treanor D. A systematic analysis of discordant diagnoses in digital pathology compared with light microscopy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141:1712–8. - PubMed
    1. Capitanio A, Dina RE, Treanor D. Digital cytology: A short review of technical and methodological approaches and applications. Cytopathology. 2018;29:317–25. - PubMed
    1. Minervini MI, Yagi Y, Marino IR, Lawson A, Nalesnik M, Randhawa P, et al. Development and experience with an integrated system for transplantation telepathology. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:1334–43. - PubMed
    1. Neil DA, Demetris AJ. Digital pathology services in acute surgical situations. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1185–6. - PubMed