Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 31;18(1):67.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0874-5.

Effect of pioglitazone in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes mellitus: a nested case-control study

Affiliations

Effect of pioglitazone in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes mellitus: a nested case-control study

Min-Hee Woo et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: Pioglitazone is an oral antidiabetic drug with multiple pleiotropic actions. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that treatment with pioglitazone reduces cardiovascular risk in patients who have had an ischemic stroke. We examined the secondary preventive effects of pioglitazone in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) based on nationwide real-world data.

Methods: A nested case-control study was conducted with data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort in Korea. Study subjects were diabetic patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke (ICD-10 code; I63) between 2002 and 2013. Cases were defined as patients who suffered from composites of recurrent stroke (I60-63), myocardial infarction (I21), or all-cause mortality after ischemic stroke. Controls were selected by incidence density sampling. Three controls were matched to each case for sex, age, treatment with insulin, and oral antidiabetic medications, with the exception of pioglitazone. Medication history after ischemic stroke was obtained by accessing the prescription records. In the matched dataset, conditional logistic regression analysis was performed with adjustments for hypertension, atrial fibrillation, prior myocardial infarction, and treatment with oral antithrombotics and statins.

Results: From the patients with acute ischemic stroke and DM, 1150 cases with primary outcomes were matched to 3450 controls. In the matched analysis, treatment with pioglitazone was significantly associated with a lower cardiovascular risk (adjusted OR [95% CI], 0.43 [0.23-0.83]).

Conclusions: In this nested case-control study using real-world data, treatment with pioglitazone exhibited significant cardiovascular preventive effect in diabetic patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Ischemic stroke; Pioglitazone; Secondary prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for the selection of cases and controls in a nested case–control study design. NHIS-NSC the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort in Korea
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk factors for primary outcomes in the patients with acute ischemic stroke and diabetes mellitus. Primary outcome is defined as composites of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, or all-cause death after acute ischemic stroke. Cases and controls are matched for same sex, age, and treatment with sulfonylurea, biguanide, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, and insulin. Adjusted OR (odds ratio), 95% CI (confidence interval) and p value are derived from conditional logistic regression analyses, which included the listed variables
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Event-free survival plot according to treatment with pioglitazone. The plot illustrates an estimated event-free survival curve according to treatment with pioglitazone (defined as exposure within the past 30 days) during the followed-up period after acute ischemic stroke. p value is obtained from the Mantel–Byar test which compares survival curves by treatment with pioglitazone

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim JY, Kang K, Kang J, Koo J, Kim D-H, Kim BJ, et al. Executive summary of stroke statistics in Korea 2018: a report from the epidemiology research council of the Korean Stroke Society. J Stroke. 2019;21:42–59. doi: 10.5853/jos.2018.03125. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kopunek SP, Michael KM, Shaughnessy M, Resnick B, Nahm E-S, Whitall J, et al. Cardiovascular risk in survivors of stroke. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:408–412. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coull AJ, Rothwell PM. Underestimation of the early risk of recurrent stroke: evidence of the need for a standard definition. Stroke. 2004;35:1925–1929. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000133129.58126.67. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Megherbi S-E, Milan C, Minier D, Couvreur G, Osseby G-V, Tilling K, et al. Association between diabetes and stroke subtype on survival and functional outcome 3 months after stroke: data from the European BIOMED Stroke Project. Stroke. 2003;34:688–694. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057975.15221.40. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Pablos-Velasco P. Pioglitazone: beyond glucose control. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8:1057–1067. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.98. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms