Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 17:2019:3451461.
doi: 10.1155/2019/3451461. eCollection 2019.

The cAMP Pathway Amplifies Early MyD88-Dependent and Type I Interferon-Independent LPS-Induced Interleukin-10 Expression in Mouse Macrophages

Affiliations

The cAMP Pathway Amplifies Early MyD88-Dependent and Type I Interferon-Independent LPS-Induced Interleukin-10 Expression in Mouse Macrophages

Orna Ernst et al. Mediators Inflamm. .

Abstract

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is a key anti-inflammatory cytokine, secreted by macrophages and other immune cells to attenuate inflammation. Autocrine type I interferons (IFNs) largely mediate the delayed expression of IL-10 by LPS-stimulated macrophages. We have previously shown that IL-10 is synergistically expressed in macrophages following a costimulus of a TLR agonist and cAMP. We now show that the cAMP pathway directly upregulates IL-10 transcription and plays an important permissive and synergistic role in early, but not late, LPS-stimulated IL-10 mRNA and protein expression in mouse macrophages and in a mouse septic shock model. Our results suggest that the loss of synergism is not due to desensitization of the cAMP inducing signal, and it is not mediated by a positive crosstalk between the cAMP and type I IFN pathways. First, cAMP elevation in LPS-treated cells decreased the secretion of type I IFN. Second, autocrine/paracrine type I IFNs induce IL-10 promoter reporter activity only additively, but not synergistically, with the cAMP pathway. IL-10 promoter reporter activity was synergistically induced by cAMP elevation in macrophages stimulated by an agonist of either TLR4, TLR2/6, or TLR7, receptors which signal via MyD88, but not by an agonist of TLR3 which signals independently of MyD88. Moreover, MyD88 knockout largely reduced the synergistic IL-10 expression, indicating that MyD88 is required for the synergism displayed by LPS with cAMP. This report delineates the temporal regulation of early cAMP-accelerated vs. late type I IFN-dependent IL-10 transcription in LPS-stimulated murine macrophages that can limit inflammation at its onset.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The cAMP pathway synergistically stimulates early, but not late, LPS-induced IL-10 transcription. (a–d) Early synergism at the IL-10 promoter reporter and IL-10 secretion levels. RAW264.7 macrophages, transfected with a full mouse IL-10 promoter reporter construct, were incubated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and/or isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) for 3 h (a, b) or for up to 24 h (c, d). (b, d) The medium was collected, and the secretion of endogenous IL-10 was measured by ELISA. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). (a, c) Luciferase reporter data expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) of values normalized against Renilla luciferase activity. (a, b) p < 0.003 and ∗∗ p < 0.0005 relative to resting cells. (c) p < 0.05 relative to resting cells for all treatments except for LPS at 3 h and Iso at 24 h. (d) Values of isoproterenol treatment were indistinguishable from control values. p < 0.05 relative to resting cells for LPS and for LPS+Iso at all time points. (c, d) p < 0.05 for LPS+Iso relative to LPS only at 3 h and 8 h. The experiments shown in (a–d) were carried out 45, 48, 14, and 12 times, respectively, with similar results. (e) Decay rate of the reporter. RAW264.7 macrophages, transfected with a full mouse IL-10 promoter reporter construct, were incubated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) for 3 h, the stimuli-containing medium was removed, and decay of the reporter was measured at the indicated time points along the dashed line. Luciferase reporter data expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) of values normalized against Renilla luciferase activity, relative to unstimulated control cells. p < 0.05 relative to resting cells at all time points. The experiment was carried out twice. (f) Early synergism at the IL-10 mRNA level. RAW264.7 macrophages were stimulated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and/or isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) or the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram (20 μM) for the indicated time. Total RNA was isolated from the cells, and IL-10 mRNA levels were assessed by real-time PCR. The intensity of IL-10 mRNA in unstimulated cells, normalized by HPRT mRNA, was set to 1. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). p < 0.05 relative to resting cells for Iso at 1 h only and for all other treatments at all time points. p < 0.05 for LPS relative to LPS+Iso or LPS+rolipram only at 1-4 h. The experiment was carried out twice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Early synergistic elevation of LPS-stimulated IL-10 expression by the cAMP pathway in BMDM and in vivo is diminished with time. (a) BMDM from C57BL/6 mice were incubated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and/or isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) for up to 24 h. The medium was collected, and secretion of endogenous IL-10 was measured by ELISA. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 6). Values of isoproterenol treatment were indistinguishable from control values. p < 0.05 for LPS+Iso relative to either LPS or control and for LPS relative to control, at all time points. (b) BALB/c mice were IP-injected with the cAMP inducer PCERA-1 (1 mg/kg) or with vehicle 30 min prior to IP administration of LPS (5 mg/kg). Blood was collected at the indicated time points. IL-10 and TNFα serum levels were measured by ELISA. Data expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6 for t = 1-1.5 h, n = 3 for other time points). p < 0.05 for LPS+PCERA-1 relative to LPS only at 1-2 h in the IL-10 assay (b, left) and at 1-3.5 h in the TNFα assay (b, right). Cytokine levels were undetected following administration of PCERA-1 alone or vehicle. The experiments were carried out twice.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The insensitivity of late-phase IL-10 induction to isoproterenol does not result from partial receptor desensitization. (a, b) RAW264.7 macrophages were transfected with a luciferase reporter regulated by 4 repeats of a consensus CRE sequence. Luciferase reporter data expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) of values normalized against Renilla luciferase activity, relative to unstimulated control cells. (a) The cells were preincubated for 21 h with either LPS (10 ng/ml) or vehicle, washed and further incubated for the following 3 h with isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) and/or LPS (10 ng/ml). (b) The cells were treated for 3 h or 24 h with isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) or with the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram (20 μM). p = 0.0002. (c) RAW264.7 macrophages were incubated for the indicated time with LPS (10 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram (20 μM). IL-10 and TNFα secretion was measured by ELISA. Data expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). p < 0.05 for LPS+rolipram relative to LPS alone at all time points except for IL-10 at 24 h. The experiments were carried out twice (a, c) or three times (b) with similar results.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Isoproterenol inhibits LPS-stimulated type I IFN secretion. RAW264.7 macrophages were incubated with LPS (10 ng/ml)±isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) for 1 h. The LPS-containing medium was then removed, and the conditioned medium was collected following 3 h without further stimulus. (a) IL-10 secretion from the macrophages was measured by ELISA. (b) Type I IFN level in the media was measured by a luciferase reporter ISRE-L929 cell line assay. Data expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) of values normalized against Renilla luciferase activity and divided by 10,000. p < 0.003 for cells costimulated with LPS+isoproterenol compared to cells stimulated with LPS alone. The experiment was carried out 5 times with similar results.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Isoproterenol synergistically amplifies only direct LPS-induced IL-10 transcription at the early phase, but not late, type I IFN-dependent LPS activity. (a, b) RAW264.7 macrophages were transfected with a full mouse IL-10 promoter reporter construct. (a) Left panel: nontransfected RAW264.7 macrophages were incubated for 21 h with either LPS (10 ng/ml) or vehicle, and the conditioned medium (CM) was collected. Then, the IL-10 promoter reporter cells were incubated for 3 h with either CM from LPS-treated cells in the presence or absence of isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) or with CM from vehicle-treated cells together with isoproterenol. The LPS antagonist polymyxin B (50 μM) was added to the CM in all treatments. Right panel: synergism between isoproterenol and LPS (10 ng/ml) is shown for comparison. (b) The IL-10 promoter reporter cells were incubated for 8 h with isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) and/or either mouse IFNα (2000 units/ml, left panel) or LPS (10 ng/ml, right panel). (a, b) Luciferase reporter data expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) of values normalized against Renilla luciferase activity, relative to unstimulated control cells. p < 0.01, ∗∗ p < 0.03 for cells monostimulated relative to cells costimulated. The experiments were carried out twice with similar results.
Figure 6
Figure 6
MyD88 is required for synergistic IL-10 expression by LPS and cAMP. (a) RAW264.7 macrophages were transfected with a full mouse IL-10 promoter reporter construct. The cells were treated for 3 h with a combination of isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM) and the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram (20 μM), in the presence or absence of a TLR agonist, either LPS (10 ng/ml; TLR4), Pam2Cys (0.1 ng/ml; TLR2/6), poly(I:C) (50 μg/ml; TLR3), or imiquimod (50 μM; TLR7). Luciferase reporter data expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) of values normalized against Renilla luciferase activity. p < 0.0001 compared to control cells stimulated with isoproterenol+rolipram. Reporter activity following administration of any TLR agonist alone (without the cAMP inducers) was indistinguishable from control values. (b) BMDM from WT (C57BL/6) and corresponding MyD88 knockout mice were incubated for 3 h with LPS (10 ng/ml) and/or isoproterenol (Iso, 1 μM). The medium was collected, and secretion of endogenous IL-10 was measured by ELISA. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 6). p < 0.01 compared to WT. The experiments were carried out five (a) or three times (b) with similar results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martinez F. O., Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Reports. 2014;6 doi: 10.12703/P6-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mosser D. M., Edwards J. P. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2008;8(12):958–969. doi: 10.1038/nri2448. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baliu-Pique M., Jusek G., Holzmann B. Neuroimmunological communication via CGRP promotes the development of a regulatory phenotype in TLR4-stimulated macrophages. European Journal of Immunology. 2014;44(12):3708–3716. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444553. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bode J. G., Ehlting C., Haussinger D. The macrophage response towards LPS and Its control through the p38(MAPK)-STAT3 axis. Cellular Signalling. 2012;24(6):1185–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang E. Y., Guo B., Doyle S. E., Cheng G. Cutting edge: involvement of the type I IFN production and signaling pathway in lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-10 production. Journal of Immunology. 2007;178(11):6705–6709. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.6705. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources