Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;32(2):230-237.
doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1620167. Epub 2019 May 25.

Misclassification of sexual health risks in a self-identified low risk cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) enrolled in a community based PrEP program

Affiliations

Misclassification of sexual health risks in a self-identified low risk cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) enrolled in a community based PrEP program

Kellie Freeborn et al. AIDS Care. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The CDC recommends PrEP for MSM at substantial risk of HIV acquisition, leaving clinicians unsure whether to prescribe PrEP to MSM who do not disclose HIV risk factors. A longitudinal cohort of MSM requesting PrEP despite reporting during a clinical visit either 100% condom use or participation in oral sex only and no other risk factors was followed over 13 months at a community clinic in San Francisco to assess the accuracy of their HIV risk perception. Participants completed a sexual and substance use behavior questionnaire at baseline, outside of the clinical visit and were followed by quarterly HIV/STI testing and condom use change questionnaires. Condomless sex increased from 0% at baseline to 12% at month 1, peaked at 34% at month 7, and then decreased again to 8% at month 13. Rates of pharyngeal GC/CT varied from 7% at baseline to 12% at month 13, while rectal GC/CT decreased from 6% at baseline to 0% at month 13. The rate of syphilis was 1% both at baseline and at month 13, however, 11% and 15% of clients tested positive for syphilis at months 1 and 7 respectively.

Keywords: MSM; PrEP; risk perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
HIV related risk factors at baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Condomless Sex
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bacterial STI Rates
None
CONSORT Diagram for Clinical Visits

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aghaizu A, Mercey D, Copas A, Johnson AM, Hart G, & Nardone A (2013). Who would use PrEP? Factors associated with intention to use among MSM in London: a community survey. Sex Transm Infect, 89(3), 207–211. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2012-050648 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold T, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Chan PA, Perez-Brumer A, Bologna ES, Beauchamps L, . . . Nunn A (2017). Social, structural, behavioral and clinical factors influencing retention in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) care in Mississippi. PLoS One, 12(2), e0172354. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172354 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Sugar CA, Bourque LB, Gee GC, Morisky DE, . . . Bolan RK (2017). Are Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Preexposure Prophylaxis Specific Enough? Formulation of a Personalized HIV Risk Score for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation. Sex Transm Dis, 44(1), 48–56. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calabrese SK, Underhill K, Earnshaw VA, Hansen NB, Kershaw TS, Magnus M, . . . Dovidio JF (2016). Framing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for the General Public: How Inclusive Messaging May Prevent Prejudice from Diminishing Public Support. AIDS Behav. doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1318-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlo Hojilla J, Koester KA, Cohen SE, Buchbinder S, Ladzekpo D, Matheson T, & Liu AY (2016). Sexual Behavior, Risk Compensation, and HIV Prevention Strategies Among Participants in the San Francisco PrEP Demonstration Project: A Qualitative Analysis of Counseling Notes. AIDS Behav(1573–3254 (Electronic)). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances