The evolving role of patient preference studies in health-care decision-making, from clinical drug development to clinical care management
- PMID: 31070048
- DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1612242
The evolving role of patient preference studies in health-care decision-making, from clinical drug development to clinical care management
Abstract
Introduction: There is a growing trend of using patient preference studies to help incorporate the patient perspective into clinical drug development, care management, and health-care decision-making. Collecting and interpreting patient preference data is integral to multi-stakeholder engagement, patient-centric drug development, and clinical care management. Operationally, challenges exist in understanding 'when' and 'how' to embark on patient preference studies. This review will provide a brief overview of stated-preference methods, discuss applications throughout the clinical drug development and care management, and highlight how preference studies serve as a powerful tool for quantifying patient experiences for better outcomes. Areas covered: We present case studies to complement the different applications of stated-preference methods in clinical drug development and care management. We discuss the applications of preference data to help inform evidence-based patient advocacy, clinical development strategy, operational feasibility, regulator benefit-risk assessments, health technology assessments, and clinical decision-making. Expert commentary: Patient preference studies can serve as a powerful tool to engage patients and their communities as well as quantify the patient voice across different stages of clinical drug development and care management to support patient-centric health-care decision-making. It is expected that the application of these strategies will quickly advance in the coming years.
Keywords: Stated-preference methods; benefit-risk assessment; drug development; health technology assessment; patient preferences; patient-centered.
Similar articles
-
Patient-centric HTA: different strokes for different folks.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(4):591-7. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1038245. Epub 2015 Apr 20. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015. PMID: 25896756
-
Quantifying Preferences in Drug Benefit-Risk Decisions.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Nov;106(5):955-959. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1447. Epub 2019 Apr 24. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019. PMID: 30929257
-
Whose preferences should be elicited for use in health-care decision-making? A case study using anticoagulant therapy.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(1):33-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1115722. Epub 2015 Nov 20. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016. PMID: 26560704
-
The evolution of patient-focused drug development and Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Feb;20(1):57-68. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1734454. Epub 2020 Mar 6. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020. PMID: 32098551 Review.
-
Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):531-542. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648. Epub 2017 Oct 23. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017. PMID: 29058478 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors influencing patient experience in hospital wards: a systematic review.BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 1;23(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02054-0. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39090643 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Preference for Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration with Every-6-Week Natalizumab (Tysabri®) Dosing: NOVA Phase IIIb Extension Study (Part 2).Neurol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1385-1401. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00647-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24. Neurol Ther. 2024. PMID: 39046635 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Perceptions of Biologic Therapies: A Qualitative Study Among Canadians Living with Severe Asthma.Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1401-1418. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02803-2. Epub 2024 Feb 13. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID: 38349560
-
Development and validation of the patient-reported outcome scale for chronic kidney disease.Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Feb;56(2):653-665. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03702-1. Epub 2023 Jul 15. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 37452989 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient Preferences for Cardiac Rehabilitation - A Systematic Review.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 6;17:75-88. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S392417. eCollection 2023. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023. PMID: 36636288 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources