Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 30:12:1756284819842043.
doi: 10.1177/1756284819842043. eCollection 2019.

Acute and subacute effects of oropharyngeal sensory stimulation with TRPV1 agonists in older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a biomechanical and neurophysiological randomized pilot study

Affiliations

Acute and subacute effects of oropharyngeal sensory stimulation with TRPV1 agonists in older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a biomechanical and neurophysiological randomized pilot study

Noemí Tomsen et al. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Older people with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) present a decline in pharyngeal sensory function. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the biomechanical and neurophysiological effects of acute and subacute oropharyngeal sensory stimulation with transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) agonists (capsaicinoids) in older patients with OD.

Methods: We studied the effect of a single dose versus multiple doses (2 weeks) of oral capsaicin treatment (10-5 M) or placebo in 28 older patients with OD (81.2 ± 4.6 years) using videofluoroscopy (penetration-aspiration scale [PAS], timing of swallow response) and electroencephalography (EEG) (latency and amplitude of pharyngeal event-related potential [ERP]).

Results: Acute stimulation by capsaicinoids 10-5 M did not improve swallow function and did not produce significant changes in pharyngeal ERP. In contrast, after 10 days of treatment, patients presented a clinically relevant and statistically significant reduction in the laryngeal vestibule closure (LVC) time (22.5%, p = 0.042), and in the PAS (24.2%, p = 0.038), compared with the placebo group. EEG results showed a reduction in the latency of the N1 peak (28.6%, p = 0.007) and an increase of the amplitude of the P1-N2 (59.4%, p = 0.038) and the N2-P2 (43.6%, p = 0.050) peaks. We observed a strong and significant correlation between the reduction in the latency of the N1 peak and change in LVC time after subacute treatment (r = 0.750, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: After 2 weeks of treatment, oropharyngeal sensory stimulation with capsaicinoids induced cortical changes that were correlated with improvements in swallowing biomechanics in older patients with OD. These results further show that sensory stimulation by TRPV1 agonists can become a useful pharmacological treatment for older patients with OD.

Keywords: deglutition disorders; neurophysiology; oropharyngeal dysphagia; therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pharyngeal event-related potential (ERP) and scalp density maps to pharyngeal ERPs for acute (a) and subacute (b) studies. At the top of each treatment, ERP traces obtained at the Cz electrode for pretreatment (blue line) and post-treatment (red line) from the placebo group and capsaicinoids group after pharyngeal electrical stimulation are shown. Deflection at time point 0 corresponds to stimulus artefact. At the bottom, current scalp density maps at each ERP peak time point for each group are shown.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlation between the change in LVC time (left) and UOS closure time (right) and the reduction in the latency of N1 peak after the multiple-dose treatment. LVC, laryngeal vestibule closure; pERP, pharyngeal event-related potential; UOS: upper oesophageal sphincter.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Differences in LORETA source activity after acute stimulation (top) and subacute stimulation (bottom) compared with basal cortical activity. Coloured voxels represent areas of significant differences in activation (blue, increase; red, decrease) after correction for multiple comparisons.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clavé P, Shaker R. Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 259–270. - PubMed
    1. Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, et al. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia 2002; 17: 139–146. - PubMed
    1. Baijens LWJ, Clavé P, Cras P, et al. European society for swallowing disorders – European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging 2016; 11: 1403–1428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rofes L, Arreola V, Romea M, et al. Pathophysiology of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the frail elderly. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: 1–9. - PubMed
    1. Ortega O, Rofes L, Martin A, et al. A comparative study between two sensory stimulation strategies after two weeks treatment on older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia 2016; 31: 706–716. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources